J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Nov;64(3):385-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-385.
Some relations between elasticity of demand and the conditions of reinforcement are reanalyzed in terms of resistance to change, in ways suggested by the metaphor of behavioral momentum; some relations between resistance to change and the conditions of reinforcement are reanalyzed in terms of elasticity of demand, in ways suggested by behavioral economics. In addition, some data on labor supply in relation to variable-ratio schedules and alternative reinforcement are reanalyzed in terms of resistance to change and compared with steady-state resistance data for performance on multiple and concurrent interval schedules. The results of these studies can be summarized by two functions based on the behavioral momentum approach, relating relative behavioral mass to relative reinforcement per response or per unit time. The former is a relation between relative unit price and relative behavioral mass, suggesting the possibility of convergent measurement of a theoretical construct common to both approaches. However, the momentum and economic approaches differ fundamentally on whether it is preferable to construe discriminated operant behavior as selected and strengthened by its consequences or as part of a behavior-consequence bundle that maximizes utility.
从抵抗变化的角度,根据行为动力的隐喻,重新分析了需求弹性与强化条件之间的某些关系;从抵抗变化的角度,根据行为经济学,重新分析了抵抗变化与强化条件之间的某些关系。此外,根据变化比率时间表和替代强化与劳动力供应的一些数据,从抵抗变化的角度进行了重新分析,并与多相同时限时间表上的稳定状态抵抗数据进行了比较。这些研究的结果可以用两个基于行为动力方法的函数来总结,将相对行为质量与相对强化反应或单位时间相关联。前者是相对单位价格与相对行为质量之间的关系,表明两种方法的一个理论结构的收敛测量是可能的。然而,在将辨别操作性行为是根据其后果来选择和加强,还是作为最大化效用的行为-后果束的一部分来构建,动力和经济方法在根本上存在分歧。