Choice As A Function Of Reinforcement Ratios In Delayed Matching-to-sample.
作者信息
Hartl J, Fantino E
出版信息
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jul;66(1):11-27. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-11.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Choice As A Function Of Reinforcement Ratios In Delayed Matching-to-sample.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jul;66(1):11-27. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-11.
2
Delayed reinforcement and delayed choice in symbolic matching to sample: Effects on stimulus discriminability.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):293-303. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-293.
3
Concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules can provide only weak evidence for matching.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jan;41(1):83-100. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-83.
4
Sample-duration effects on pigeons' delayed matching as a function of predictability of duration.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Nov;72(3):279-97. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-279.
5
Sample-stimulus discriminability and sensitivity to reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):159-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-159.
6
Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004 Mar-Apr;26(2):179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2003.12.004.
7
Human choice in concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):453-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-453.
8
Pigeons prefer conditional stimuli over their absence: a comment on Roberts et al. (2009).
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):506-9. doi: 10.1037/a0020202.
9
Reinforcer efficacy in a delayed matching-to-sample task.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Jan;69(1):77-85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-77.
10
Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Mar;23(2):241-6. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-241.
引用本文的文献
1
Toward a Procedure to Study Rule-Governed Choice: Preliminary Data.
Anal Verbal Behav. 2024 May 28;40(2):280-305. doi: 10.1007/s40616-024-00206-6. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Judgment and decision making: Behavioral approaches.
Behav Anal. 1998 Fall;21(2):203-18. doi: 10.1007/BF03391964.
3
Suboptimal choice in nonhuman animals: rats commit the sunk cost error.
Learn Behav. 2012 Jun;40(2):195-206. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0055-1.
4
On the development and mechanics of delayed matching-to-sample performance.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Mar;95(2):221-36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-221.
5
Observing responses: maintained by good news only?
Behav Processes. 2010 Sep;85(1):80-2. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
6
Are birds smarter than mathematicians? Pigeons (Columba livia) perform optimally on a version of the Monty Hall Dilemma.
J Comp Psychol. 2010 Feb;124(1):1-13. doi: 10.1037/a0017703.
7
Matching-to-sample by pigeons: the dissociation of comparison choice frequency from the probability of reinforcement.
Behav Processes. 2008 Jun;78(2):185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.01.015. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
8
Matching-to-sample in pigeons: in the absence of sample memory, sample frequency is a better predictor of comparison choice than the probability of reinforcement for comparison choice.
Learn Behav. 2007 Nov;35(4):242-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03206430.
9
Remembering as discrimination in delayed matching to sample: discriminability and bias.
Learn Behav. 2007 Aug;35(3):177-83. doi: 10.3758/bf03193053.
10
Use of base rates and case cue information in making likelihood estimates.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Apr;34(3):603-18. doi: 10.3758/bf03193583.
Zotero 插件