Suppr超能文献

相似文献

2
Testing the limits of optimality: the effect of base rates in the Monty Hall dilemma.
Learn Behav. 2014 Mar;42(1):69-82. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0126-6.
4
The Monty Hall dilemma with pigeons: No, you choose for me.
Learn Behav. 2015 Sep;43(3):209-16. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0172-3.
5
Further investigation of the Monty Hall Dilemma in pigeons and rats.
Behav Processes. 2015 Mar;112:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
6
The Monty Hall dilemma in pigeons: effect of investment in initial choice.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Oct;20(5):997-1004. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0403-6.
8
A new version of the Monty Hall Dilemma with unequal probabilities.
Behav Processes. 1999 Nov;48(1-2):25-34. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(99)00066-2.
9
Sunk cost: pigeons (Columba livia), too, show bias to complete a task rather than shift to another.
J Comp Psychol. 2012 Feb;126(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023826. Epub 2011 May 16.
10
The collider principle in causal reasoning: why the Monty Hall dilemma is so hard.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):434-49. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.434.

引用本文的文献

1
Dogs understand the role of a human partner in a cooperative task.
Sci Rep. 2024 May 3;14(1):10179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60772-6.
2
Chronic high-dose testosterone impairs economic decision making, but has no effect on memory in male rats.
Behav Processes. 2024 May;218:105044. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105044. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
3
Familiarity with visual stimuli boosts recency bias in macaques.
PeerJ. 2019 Nov 25;7:e8105. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8105. eCollection 2019.
4
Why Humans Fail in Solving the Monty Hall Dilemma: A Systematic Review.
Psychol Belg. 2018 Jun 1;58(1):128-158. doi: 10.5334/pb.274.
6
Zeno's paradox in decision-making.
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Apr 13;283(1828). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0291.
7
Negative outcomes evoke cyclic irrational decisions in Rock, Paper, Scissors.
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 4;6:20479. doi: 10.1038/srep20479.
8
Reasoning and choice in the Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD): implications for improving Bayesian reasoning.
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 31;6:353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00353. eCollection 2015.
9
The Monty Hall dilemma with pigeons: No, you choose for me.
Learn Behav. 2015 Sep;43(3):209-16. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0172-3.
10
Testing the limits of optimality: the effect of base rates in the Monty Hall dilemma.
Learn Behav. 2014 Mar;42(1):69-82. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0126-6.

本文引用的文献

1
A new version of the Monty Hall Dilemma with unequal probabilities.
Behav Processes. 1999 Nov;48(1-2):25-34. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(99)00066-2.
2
Superstition in the pigeon.
J Exp Psychol. 1948 Apr;38(2):168-72. doi: 10.1037/h0055873.
3
Choice As A Function Of Reinforcement Ratios In Delayed Matching-to-sample.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jul;66(1):11-27. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-11.
4
The matching law applies to wagtails' foraging in the wild.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jan;45(1):15-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-15.
5
On the law of effect.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243.
6
The collider principle in causal reasoning: why the Monty Hall dilemma is so hard.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):434-49. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.434.
8
Probability-matching in the pigeon.
Am J Psychol. 1962 Dec;75:634-9.
9
Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4(3):267-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267.
10
A descriptive aproach to the dynamics of choice behavior.
Behav Sci. 1961 Jul;6:177-84. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830060302.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验