Herbranson Walter T, Schroeder Julia
Department of Psychology, Whitman College, Walla Walla, WA 99362, USA.
J Comp Psychol. 2010 Feb;124(1):1-13. doi: 10.1037/a0017703.
The "Monty Hall Dilemma" (MHD) is a well known probability puzzle in which a player tries to guess which of three doors conceals a desirable prize. After an initial choice is made, one of the remaining doors is opened, revealing no prize. The player is then given the option of staying with their initial guess or switching to the other unopened door. Most people opt to stay with their initial guess, despite the fact that switching doubles the probability of winning. A series of experiments investigated whether pigeons (Columba livia), like most humans, would fail to maximize their expected winnings in a version of the MHD. Birds completed multiple trials of a standard MHD, with the three response keys in an operant chamber serving as the three doors and access to mixed grain as the prize. Across experiments, the probability of gaining reinforcement for switching and staying was manipulated, and birds adjusted their probability of switching and staying to approximate the optimal strategy. Replication of the procedure with human participants showed that humans failed to adopt optimal strategies, even with extensive training.
“蒙提霍尔困境”(MHD)是一个著名的概率谜题,玩家要猜测三扇门中哪一扇门后藏有诱人奖品。在做出初始选择后,剩下的门中有一扇会被打开,显示没有奖品。然后玩家可以选择坚持其初始猜测,或者切换到另一扇未打开的门。尽管切换会使获胜概率翻倍,但大多数人还是选择坚持其初始猜测。一系列实验调查了鸽子(家鸽)是否会像大多数人一样,在MHD的一个版本中无法将预期收益最大化。鸟类完成了标准MHD的多次试验,操作箱中的三个响应键充当三扇门,获得混合谷物作为奖品。在各个实验中,切换和坚持获得强化的概率被操纵,鸟类调整了它们切换和坚持的概率以接近最优策略。对人类参与者重复该程序表明,即使经过大量训练,人类也未能采用最优策略。