Nikolopoulos Georgios K, Tsantes Argirios E, Bagos Pantelis G, Travlou Anthi, Vaiopoulos Georgios
Hellenic Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Athens, Greece.
Thromb Res. 2007;119(4):501-10. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.04.002. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
Platelet adhesion to fibrillar collagen via the membrane glycoprotein (GP) Ia/IIa (alpha2beta1), is a crucial event in the pathogenesis of arterial occlusive disorders. The C807T single nucleotide polymorphism of the integrin, alpha 2 (ITGA2) gene has been shown to correlate with the platelet GPIa/IIa density. Consequently, subjects with the 807T allele, who express the highest receptor density, might have an increased potential of platelet adhesion and, hence an increased risk of cerebrovascular disease. However, the research findings remain controversial.
A comprehensive electronic search was carried out up until November 2005 and 7 independent studies with a maximum of 774 cases and 1074 controls were analyzed using random effects models.
The pooled frequency of the T allele was 36.33% in cases and 37.01% in controls. The T versus the C allele contrast gave an OR of 1.11 (95% confidence interval=0.827-1.499). All the other comparisons failed to show any significant result. Age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors were included as covariates into a meta-regression model without a significant finding.
This meta-analysis do not support an association between the C807T polymorphism of ITGA2 gene and stroke, but given the significant between study heterogeneity and the small number of studies, the summary effect should be interpreted carefully.
血小板通过膜糖蛋白(GP)Ia/IIa(α2β1)与纤维状胶原蛋白的黏附是动脉闭塞性疾病发病机制中的关键事件。整合素α2(ITGA2)基因的C807T单核苷酸多态性已被证明与血小板糖蛋白Ia/IIa密度相关。因此,携带807T等位基因的个体,其受体密度最高,可能具有更高的血小板黏附潜力,从而增加患脑血管疾病的风险。然而,研究结果仍存在争议。
截至2005年11月进行了全面的电子检索,并使用随机效应模型分析了7项独立研究,最多涉及774例病例和1074例对照。
病例组中T等位基因的合并频率为36.33%,对照组为37.01%。T等位基因与C等位基因的对比得出的比值比为1.11(95%置信区间=0.827-1.499)。所有其他比较均未显示任何显著结果。将年龄、性别和心血管危险因素作为协变量纳入meta回归模型,未发现显著结果。
这项meta分析不支持ITGA2基因的C807T多态性与中风之间存在关联,但鉴于研究间存在显著异质性且研究数量较少,对汇总效应应谨慎解释。