Horowitz Jason L, Garber Judy
Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203-5721, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Jun;74(3):401-15. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.401.
Research on the prevention of depressive symptoms in children and adolescents was reviewed and synthesized with meta-analysis. When all 30 studies were included, selective prevention programs were found to be more effective than universal programs immediately following intervention. Both selective and indicated prevention programs were more effective than universal programs at follow-up, even when the 2 studies with college students were excluded. Effect sizes for selective and indicated prevention programs tended to be small to moderate, both immediately postintervention and at an average follow-up of 6 months. Most effective interventions are more accurately described as treatment rather than prevention. Suggestions for future research include testing potential moderators (e.g., age, gender, anxiety, parental depression) and mechanisms, designing programs that are developmentally appropriate and gender and culturally sensitive, including longer follow-ups, and using multiple measures and methods to assess both symptoms and diagnoses.
对儿童和青少年抑郁症状预防的研究进行了综述,并通过荟萃分析进行综合。纳入所有30项研究时,发现选择性预防项目在干预后即刻比普遍性项目更有效。在随访时,选择性和指导性预防项目都比普遍性项目更有效,即使排除了两项针对大学生的研究。选择性和指导性预防项目的效应量在干预后即刻和平均6个月的随访时往往为小到中等。最有效的干预措施更准确地说是治疗而非预防。对未来研究的建议包括测试潜在的调节因素(如年龄、性别、焦虑、父母抑郁)和机制,设计适合发育阶段、对性别和文化敏感的项目,包括更长时间的随访,并使用多种测量方法来评估症状和诊断。