van der Elst Wim, van Boxtel Martin P J, van Breukelen Gerard J P, Jolles Jelle
Maastricht Brain and Behavior Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Aug;28(6):998-1009. doi: 10.1080/13803390591004428.
The Letter Digit Substitution Test (LDST) is based on earlier developed substitution tests (e.g., Digit Symbol Substitution Test) but uses over-learned signs instead of the symbols used in other substitution tests. The written and oral versions of the LDST were administered to a large, cognitively screened sample (N = 1,858) of adults aged 24 to 81 years. Age was the most important predictor of LDST performance, and females outperformed males. A low level of education profoundly influenced LDST performance: the effect of a low versus high level of education on LDST performance was comparable to about 20 years of aging. Regression-based normative data were prepared for both the written and oral versions of the LDST.
字母数字替换测试(LDST)基于早期开发的替换测试(如数字符号替换测试),但使用的是过度学习的符号,而非其他替换测试中使用的符号。LDST的书面版和口语版被施用于一个经过认知筛选的、年龄在24至81岁之间的大型成人样本(N = 1,858)。年龄是LDST表现的最重要预测因素,女性的表现优于男性。低教育水平对LDST表现有深远影响:低教育水平与高教育水平对LDST表现的影响相当于约20年的衰老效应。基于回归分析的常模数据已针对LDST的书面版和口语版编制完成。