Suppr超能文献

农业土壤温室气体排放:国家清单方法综述

Agricultural soil greenhouse gas emissions: a review of national inventory methods.

作者信息

Lokupitiya Erandathie, Paustian Keith

机构信息

Department of Soil and Crop Sciences and Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2006 Jul 6;35(4):1413-27. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0157. Print 2006 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are required to submit national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories, together with information on methods used in estimating their emissions. Currently agricultural activities contribute a significant portion (approximately 20%) of global anthropogenic GHG emissions, and agricultural soils have been identified as one of the main GHG source categories within the agricultural sector. However, compared to many other GHG sources, inventory methods for soils are relatively more complex and have been implemented only to varying degrees among member countries. This review summarizes and evaluates the methods used by Annex 1 countries in estimating CO2 and N2O emissions in agricultural soils. While most countries utilize the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) default methodology, several Annex 1 countries are developing more advanced methods that are tailored for specific country circumstances. Based on the latest national inventory reporting, about 56% of the Annex 1 countries use IPCC Tier 1 methods, about 26% use Tier 2 methods, and about 18% do not estimate or report N2O emissions from agricultural soils. More than 65% of the countries do not report CO2 emissions from the cultivation of mineral soils, organic soils, or liming, and only a handful of countries have used country-specific, Tier 3 methods. Tier 3 methods usually involve process-based models and detailed, geographically specific activity data. Such methods can provide more robust, accurate estimates of emissions and removals but require greater diligence in documentation, transparency, and uncertainty assessment to ensure comparability between countries. Availability of detailed, spatially explicit activity data is a major constraint to implementing higher tiered methods in many countries.

摘要

《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC)的缔约方需要提交国家温室气体(GHG)清单,以及有关估算其排放量所用方法的信息。目前,农业活动在全球人为温室气体排放中占很大比例(约20%),农业土壤已被确定为农业部门内主要的温室气体源类别之一。然而,与许多其他温室气体源相比,土壤清单方法相对更为复杂,且在成员国中仅得到不同程度的实施。本综述总结并评估了附件一国家在估算农业土壤中二氧化碳和氧化亚氮排放量时所用的方法。虽然大多数国家采用政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)的默认方法,但一些附件一国家正在开发更适合特定国情的先进方法。根据最新的国家清单报告,约56%的附件一国家使用IPCC一级方法,约26%使用二级方法,约18%未估算或报告农业土壤中的氧化亚氮排放量。超过65%的国家未报告矿质土壤、有机土壤或石灰施用产生的二氧化碳排放量,只有少数国家使用了特定国家的三级方法。三级方法通常涉及基于过程的模型和详细的、特定地理区域的活动数据。此类方法可以提供更可靠、准确的排放和清除估算,但需要在文件记录、透明度和不确定性评估方面更加勤勉,以确保各国之间具有可比性。在许多国家,详细的、空间明确的活动数据的可用性是实施更高层级方法的主要制约因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验