Suppr超能文献

肿瘤相关组织嗜酸性粒细胞增多症(TATE)中嗜酸性粒细胞计数的意义。

Significance of eosinophil counting in tumor associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE).

作者信息

Alkhabuli J O, High A S

机构信息

College of Dentistry, University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2006 Sep;42(8):849-50. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.11.023. Epub 2006 Jul 7.

Abstract

Eosinophils are present in large numbers in some squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity. Whilst it is proposed that they have an 'immuno-protective' effect, this remains unproven. The contradictory reports may be due to inconsistencies in eosinophil counting. Eighty-one cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SSC) of oral tongue were examined. Two methods of eosinophil counting were performed. In the first method (classical), the eosinophils were counted per 10 HPF. In the second method (our so-called density method), the highest eosinophil density per surface area was counted for each case. The two methods were correlated. Using the classical method a number of fields in cases ranked low, contained more than 10 eosinophils. Likewise, some moderate cases contained more than 100 eosinophils. There is poor correlation between the classical and density counts. Nevertheless, good correlation between the two methods could be achieved if the boundaries of the classical method are modified. Eosinophils invariably appear in clusters. We feel that an assessment of density may well be better than classical counting, and have more relationship with function.

摘要

嗜酸性粒细胞大量存在于某些口腔鳞状细胞癌中。虽然有人提出它们具有“免疫保护”作用,但这一点尚未得到证实。相互矛盾的报道可能是由于嗜酸性粒细胞计数的不一致。对81例舌鳞状细胞癌(SSC)进行了检查。采用了两种嗜酸性粒细胞计数方法。第一种方法(经典方法)是每10个高倍视野计数嗜酸性粒细胞。第二种方法(我们所谓的密度法)是计算每个病例每表面积的最高嗜酸性粒细胞密度。两种方法相互关联。使用经典方法时,一些在病例中排名较低的视野含有超过10个嗜酸性粒细胞。同样,一些中等病例含有超过100个嗜酸性粒细胞。经典计数和密度计数之间的相关性较差。然而,如果修改经典方法的界限,两种方法之间可以实现良好的相关性。嗜酸性粒细胞总是成簇出现。我们认为密度评估可能比经典计数更好,并且与功能有更多关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验