Schreiber A, Vonthein R, Reinhard J, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Connert C, Schiefer U
University Eye Hospital, Department of Pathophysiology of Vision and Neuro-Ophthalmology, Tuebingen, Germany.
Neurology. 2006 Jul 11;67(1):143-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000223338.26040.fb.
The authors examined 16 patients with stable homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs) with static automated perimetry (SAP). Training effect E was defined as difference of the proportions of absolutely defective locations in all test locations, before and after visual restitution training (VRT). E was 0.05 +/- 0.05 (mean +/- SD). The authors observed a relevant training effect (E >or= 0.12) in two subjects, but only monocularly. VRT has little effect on absolute HVFDs in SAP.
作者使用静态自动视野计（SAP）对16例患有稳定同向性视野缺损（HVFDs）的患者进行了检查。训练效果E定义为视觉恢复训练（VRT）前后所有测试位置中绝对缺损位置比例的差异。E为0.05±0.05（平均值±标准差）。作者在两名受试者中观察到了显著的训练效果（E≥0.12），但仅为单眼。VRT对SAP中绝对HVFDs的影响很小。
