Campbell Martha, Sahin-Hodoglugil Nuriye Nalan, Potts Malcolm
Center for Entrepreneurship in International Health and Development, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley 94720-7360, USA.
Stud Fam Plann. 2006 Jun;37(2):87-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2006.00088.x.
The evidence in the demographic and family planning literature of the range and diversity of the barriers to fertility regulation in many developing countries is reviewed in this article from a consumer perspective. Barriers are defined as the constraining factors standing between women and the realistic availability of the technologies and correct information they need in order to decide whether and when to have a child. The barriers include limited method choice, financial costs, the status of women, medical and legal restrictions, provider bias, and misinformation. The presence or absence of barriers to fertility regulation is likely an important determinant of the pace of fertility decline or its delay in many countries. At the same time, barriers inhibit women's ability to avoid unintended pregnancy. Problems of quantifying barriers limit understanding of their importance. New ways to quantify them and to identify misinformation, which is often concealed in survey data, are needed for future research.
本文从消费者视角审视了人口与计划生育文献中有关许多发展中国家生育调节障碍的范围和多样性的证据。障碍被定义为阻碍妇女获得她们所需的技术和正确信息以决定是否生育及何时生育的限制因素。这些障碍包括方法选择有限、经济成本、妇女地位、医学和法律限制、提供者偏见以及错误信息。生育调节障碍的存在与否很可能是许多国家生育率下降速度或延迟的一个重要决定因素。与此同时,障碍抑制了妇女避免意外怀孕的能力。量化障碍的问题限制了对其重要性的理解。未来研究需要新的方法来量化障碍并识别常常隐藏在调查数据中的错误信息。