Brown Ryan P, Day Eric Anthony
Department of Psychology, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):979-85. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.979.
This study addresses recent criticisms aimed at the interpretation of stereotype threat research and methodological weaknesses of previous studies that have examined race differences on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM). African American and White undergraduates completed the APM under three conditions. In two threat conditions, participants received either standard APM instructions (standard threat) or were told that the APM was an IQ test (high threat). In a low threat condition, participants were told that the APM was a set of puzzles and that the researchers wanted their opinions of them. Results supported the stereotype threat interpretation of race differences in cognitive ability test scores. Although African American participants underperformed Whites under both standard and high threat instructions, they performed just as well as Whites did under low threat instructions.
本研究回应了近期针对刻板印象威胁研究的解读以及以往研究在考察瑞文高级渐进矩阵测验(APM)中种族差异时存在的方法学弱点所提出的批评。非裔美国和白人本科生在三种条件下完成了APM测验。在两种威胁条件下,参与者要么收到标准的APM测验说明(标准威胁),要么被告知APM是一项智商测试(高威胁)。在低威胁条件下,参与者被告知APM是一组谜题,研究人员想听听他们对这些谜题的看法。结果支持了认知能力测试分数中种族差异的刻板印象威胁解释。尽管在标准和高威胁说明条件下,非裔美国参与者的表现不如白人,但在低威胁说明条件下,他们的表现与白人一样好。