• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Cost-effectiveness of the addition of acarbose to the treatment of patients with type-2 diabetes in Spain].

作者信息

Piñol Carme, Roze Stephane, Valentine William, Evers Thomas

机构信息

Química Farmacéutica Bayer, S. A., Barcelona, España.

出版信息

Gac Sanit. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(2):97-104; discussion 105. doi: 10.1157/13101034.

DOI:10.1157/13101034
PMID:17419924
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the cost-effectiveness of the addition of acarbose to existing treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) in Spain.

METHODS

The CORE Diabetes Model (a published and validated computer simulation model) was used to project long-term clinical and cost outcomes in DM2. Transition probabilities and risk adjustments were derived from published sources. Treatment effects and baseline cohort characteristics were based on a meta-analysis. Direct costs were retrieved from published sources and projected over patient lifetimes from the perspective of the Spanish National Health Service. Costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 3% per year. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Acarbose treatment was associated with improved life expectancy (0.23 years) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) (0.21 years). Direct costs were on average euro 468 per patient more expensive with acarbose than with placebo. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were euro 2,002 per life year gained and euro 2,199 per QALY gained. An acceptability curve showed that with a willingness to pay euro 20,000, which is generally accepted to represent very good value for money, acarbose treatment was associated with a 93.5% probability of being cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

This long-term economic study showed that the addition of acarbose to existing therapy for DM2 was associated with improvements in life expectancy and QALYs in these patients.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Cost-effectiveness of the addition of acarbose to the treatment of patients with type-2 diabetes in Spain].
Gac Sanit. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(2):97-104; discussion 105. doi: 10.1157/13101034.
2
Acarbose in addition to existing treatments in patients with type 2 diabetes: health economic analysis in a German setting.阿卡波糖联合现有治疗方案用于2型糖尿病患者:德国背景下的卫生经济学分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jul;22(7):1415-24. doi: 10.1185/030079906X115531.
3
Cost-effectiveness of insulin aspart versus human soluble insulin in type 2 diabetes in four European countries: subgroup analyses from the PREDICTIVE study.门冬胰岛素与人可溶性胰岛素治疗四个欧洲国家2型糖尿病的成本效益:PREDICTIVE研究的亚组分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 May;24(5):1417-28. doi: 10.1185/030079908x297295. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
4
PROactive 06: cost-effectiveness of pioglitazone in Type 2 diabetes in the UK.PROactive 06:吡格列酮在英国2型糖尿病治疗中的成本效益
Diabet Med. 2007 Sep;24(9):982-1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02188.x. Epub 2007 Jun 25.
5
Cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart in poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes patients in China.在中国血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中转换为使用双相门冬胰岛素的成本效益分析
Adv Ther. 2008 Aug;25(8):752-74. doi: 10.1007/s12325-008-0080-4.
6
Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Glargine Versus Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin for Type 2 Diabetes in Thailand.甘精胰岛素与低精蛋白锌胰岛素治疗泰国2型糖尿病的长期成本效益
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Jun;14(3):281-92. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0228-3.
7
Exenatide versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK: a model of long-term clinical and cost outcomes.艾塞那肽与甘精胰岛素治疗英国2型糖尿病患者的比较:长期临床及成本效益模型
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Mar;23(3):609-22. doi: 10.1185/030079907X178685.
8
Cost-effectiveness of detemir-based basal/bolus therapy versus NPH-based basal/bolus therapy for type 1 diabetes in a UK setting: an economic analysis based on meta-analysis results of four clinical trials.在英国背景下,德谷胰岛素基础/餐时疗法与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素基础/餐时疗法用于1型糖尿病治疗的成本效益:基于四项临床试验荟萃分析结果的经济学分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Nov;20(11):1729-46. doi: 10.1185/030079904X5661.
9
Cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart 30 from human insulin in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in South Korea.在韩国,将血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的人胰岛素转换为双相胰岛素类似物门冬胰岛素 30 的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12 Suppl 3:S55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00628.x.
10
Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in patients with type 2 diabetes on oral anti-diabetes drugs: cost-effectiveness in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain.口服降糖药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的自我血糖监测(SMBG):法国、德国、意大利和西班牙的成本效益。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jan;26(1):163-75. doi: 10.1185/03007990903429765.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriever after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator compared with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator alone in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in Spain.在西班牙,与单独使用静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂相比,静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂后使用支架取栓器进行机械取栓治疗大血管闭塞所致急性缺血性卒中的成本效益。
Eur Stroke J. 2017 Sep;2(3):272-284. doi: 10.1177/2396987317721865. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
2
Impact of small study bias on cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and value of information analyses.小样本研究偏倚对成本效益可接受性曲线和信息价值分析的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Mar;16(2):219-23. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0607-3. Epub 2014 May 20.
3
α-Glucosidase inhibitors and their use in clinical practice.α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂及其在临床实践中的应用。
Arch Med Sci. 2012 Nov 9;8(5):899-906. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2012.31621. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
4
The use of cost per life year gained as a measurement of cost-effectiveness in Spain: a systematic review of recent publications.使用获得的每生命年成本作为西班牙成本效益的衡量标准:对近期出版物的系统回顾。
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Dec;13(6):723-40. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0326-y. Epub 2011 Jun 10.