Suda T, Fujisawa T, Enomoto N, Nakamura Y, Inui N, Naito T, Hashimoto D, Sato J, Toyoshima M, Hashizume H, Chida K
Second Division, Dept of Internal Medicine, and 2 Dermatology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Eur Respir J. 2006 Nov;28(5):1005-12. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00038806. Epub 2006 Jul 12.
The aim of the present study was to clarify the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with amyopathic dermatomyositis (ILD-ADM). The study consisted of 14 consecutive patients with ILD-ADM. Patients were classified into two categories, acute/subacute and chronic forms, according to the clinical presentation of ILD. The clinical features, responsiveness to therapy, and prognosis between the two forms were compared. Nine ILD-ADM patients were categorised as the acute/subacute form, and five as the chronic form. Arterial oxygen tension was significantly lower in the acute/subacute ILD than chronic ILD patients. On high-resolution computed tomography, ground-glass opacities were frequently found in the two forms, but consolidation was more common in acute/subacute ILD than chronic ILD. Bronchoalveolar lavage analysis showed higher numbers of total cells and lymphocytes in acute/subacute ILD than chronic ILD. Histologically, the most common finding was nonspecific interstitial pneumonia in the two forms, while diffuse alveolar damage was only found in acute/subacute ILD. Acute/subacute ILD was generally resistant to therapy, while chronic ILD responded well. Notably, the mortality of acute/subacute ILD was much higher than that of chronic ILD (67 versus 0%, respectively). In conclusion, interstitial lung disease associated with amyopathic dermatomyositis includes two different forms, the acute/subacute and chronic forms, with distinct prognoses.
本研究的目的是阐明合并无肌病性皮肌炎的间质性肺疾病(ILD-ADM)患者的临床特征和预后。该研究纳入了14例连续的ILD-ADM患者。根据ILD的临床表现,患者被分为急性/亚急性和慢性两类。比较了两种类型之间的临床特征、对治疗的反应性和预后。9例ILD-ADM患者被归类为急性/亚急性型,5例为慢性型。急性/亚急性ILD患者的动脉血氧分压显著低于慢性ILD患者。在高分辨率计算机断层扫描上,两种类型均常见磨玻璃影,但实变在急性/亚急性ILD中比慢性ILD更常见。支气管肺泡灌洗分析显示,急性/亚急性ILD的总细胞数和淋巴细胞数高于慢性ILD。组织学上,两种类型最常见的表现是非特异性间质性肺炎,而弥漫性肺泡损伤仅在急性/亚急性ILD中发现。急性/亚急性ILD通常对治疗耐药,而慢性ILD反应良好。值得注意的是,急性/亚急性ILD的死亡率远高于慢性ILD(分别为67%和0%)。总之,合并无肌病性皮肌炎的间质性肺疾病包括急性/亚急性和慢性两种不同类型,预后不同。