Mangione Carol M, Gerzoff Robert B, Williamson David F, Steers W Neil, Kerr Eve A, Brown Arleen F, Waitzfelder Beth E, Marrero David G, Dudley R Adams, Kim Catherine, Herman William, Thompson Theodore J, Safford Monika M, Selby Joe V
Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095-1736, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jul 18;145(2):107-16. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-2-200607180-00008.
Although disease management programs are widely implemented, little is known about their effectiveness.
To determine whether disease management by physician groups is associated with diabetes care processes, control of intermediate outcomes, or the amount of medication used when intermediate outcomes are above target levels.
Cross-sectional study.
Patients were randomly sampled from 63 physician groups nested in 7 health plans sponsored by Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (87%) and from 4 health plans with individual physician contracts (13%).
8661 adults with diabetes who completed a survey (2000-2001) and had medical record data.
Physician group and health plan directors described their organizations' use of physician reminders, performance feedback, and structured care management on a survey; their responses were used to determine measures of intensity of disease management. The current study measured 8 processes of care, including most recent hemoglobin A1c level, systolic blood pressure, serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, and several measures of medication use.
Increased use of any of 3 disease management strategies was significantly associated with higher adjusted rates of retinal screening, nephropathy screening, foot examinations, and measurement of hemoglobin A1c levels. Serum lipid level testing and influenza vaccine administration were associated with greater use of structured care management and performance feedback. Greater use of performance feedback correlated with an increased rate of foot examinations (difference, 5 percentage points [95% CI, 1 to 8 percentage points]), and greater use of physician reminders was associated with an increased rate of nephropathy screening (difference, 15 percentage points [CI, 6 to 23 percentage points]). No strategies were associated with intermediate outcome levels or level of medication management.
Physician groups were not randomly sampled from population-based listings, and disease management strategies were not randomly allocated across groups.
Disease management strategies were associated with better processes of diabetes care but not with improved intermediate outcomes or level of medication management. A greater focus on direct measurement, feedback, and reporting of intermediate outcome levels or of level of medication management may enhance the effectiveness of these programs.
尽管疾病管理项目已广泛实施,但对其有效性却知之甚少。
确定医生团队进行的疾病管理是否与糖尿病护理流程、中间结果的控制或中间结果高于目标水平时的用药量有关。
横断面研究。
患者从嵌套于7个由“将糖尿病研究转化为行动”资助的健康计划中的63个医生团队(87%)以及4个有个体医生合同的健康计划(13%)中随机抽取。
8661名患有糖尿病的成年人,他们完成了一项调查(2000 - 2001年)并拥有病历数据。
医生团队和健康计划负责人在一项调查中描述了他们所在组织对医生提醒、绩效反馈和结构化护理管理的使用情况;他们的回答被用于确定疾病管理强度的衡量指标。本研究测量了8个护理流程,包括最近的糖化血红蛋白水平、收缩压、血清低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平以及几种用药量的测量指标。
三种疾病管理策略中任何一种使用的增加都与视网膜筛查、肾病筛查、足部检查以及糖化血红蛋白水平测量的校正率显著提高相关。血清脂质水平检测和流感疫苗接种与更多地使用结构化护理管理和绩效反馈相关。更多地使用绩效反馈与足部检查率的增加相关(差异为5个百分点[95%可信区间,1至8个百分点]),更多地使用医生提醒与肾病筛查率的增加相关(差异为15个百分点[可信区间,6至23个百分点])。没有策略与中间结果水平或用药管理水平相关。
医生团队并非从基于人群的列表中随机抽取,且疾病管理策略并非在各团队间随机分配。
疾病管理策略与更好的糖尿病护理流程相关,但与改善中间结果或用药管理水平无关。更加关注中间结果水平或用药管理水平的直接测量、反馈和报告可能会提高这些项目的有效性。