Suppr超能文献

7979名30岁及以上受试者随机样本中的姿势平衡。

Postural balance in a random sample of 7,979 subjects aged 30 years and over.

作者信息

Era P, Sainio P, Koskinen S, Haavisto P, Vaara M, Aromaa A

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, Finland.

出版信息

Gerontology. 2006;52(4):204-13. doi: 10.1159/000093652.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reliable normative data for force platform measurements of postural balance have not been available.

METHODS

Data on postural balance were collected from a representative nationwide sample of a Finnish population aged >or=30 years (n = 7,979). As part of a comprehensive health survey (Health 2000), postural balance was measured with the help of a force platform system in four test conditions: normal standing with eyes open and closed (both for 30 s), semi-tandem (20 s) and tandem stand with eyes open (20 s). In addition, balance abilities were also evaluated by a non-instrumented field test.

RESULTS

The main findings of this study indicated that the differences in balance between subjects belonging to different age categories were apparent already among young and middle-aged subjects. This is true, however, only for the more accurate force platform measurements, as the field test showed a clear ceiling effect up to 60 years of age. At higher ages both methods indicated a further, accelerating decline in balance function. In most cases, males tended to have more pronounced sway, as indicated by the speed and amplitude aspects of the movement of the center of pressure during the force platform registrations and these differences were larger in the older age groups. In contrast, in the field test a larger proportion of males were able to achieve the highest category (10 s in tandem stand) and the proportion of subjects unable to stand for a minimum of 10 s feet side by side was larger among females than males. These observations may partly be due to differences in the participation/acceptable performance in the different tests. In addition, the field test and force platform measurements may partially reflect different aspects of balance abilities.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study provide normative values for force platform balance tests at an age of 30 years and above. Deterioration in balance function clearly starts at relatively young ages and further accelerates from at about 60 years upwards. Due to systematic differences between males and females, separate normative values for both sexes are needed. Due to marked ceiling effects the field test can only be recommended for older individuals, aged >/=60. On the other hand, force platform registrations in the more demanding tests (semi-tandem and tandem stands) suffer from floor effects in the oldest age groups.

摘要

背景

姿势平衡的力平台测量尚无可靠的标准数据。

方法

从芬兰全国具有代表性的年龄≥30岁的人群样本(n = 7979)中收集姿势平衡数据。作为一项全面健康调查(2000年健康调查)的一部分,借助力平台系统在四种测试条件下测量姿势平衡:睁眼和闭眼正常站立(均为30秒)、半串联站立(20秒)以及睁眼串联站立(20秒)。此外,还通过非仪器化现场测试评估平衡能力。

结果

本研究的主要发现表明,不同年龄组受试者之间的平衡差异在青年和中年受试者中就已明显。然而,这仅适用于更精确的力平台测量,因为现场测试显示在60岁之前存在明显的天花板效应。在更高年龄段,两种方法均表明平衡功能进一步加速下降。在大多数情况下,男性往往有更明显的晃动,力平台记录期间压力中心运动的速度和幅度方面表明了这一点,且这些差异在老年组中更大。相比之下,在现场测试中,更大比例的男性能够达到最高等级(串联站立10秒),而女性中双脚并排站立至少10秒都无法完成的受试者比例高于男性。这些观察结果可能部分归因于不同测试中的参与度/可接受表现的差异。此外,现场测试和力平台测量可能部分反映了平衡能力的不同方面。

结论

本研究结果提供了30岁及以上年龄的力平台平衡测试的标准值。平衡功能的恶化显然在相对年轻时就已开始,并在大约60岁及以上时进一步加速。由于男性和女性之间存在系统性差异,需要两性各自的标准值。由于明显的天花板效应,现场测试仅推荐用于年龄≥60岁的老年人。另一方面,在要求更高的测试(半串联和串联站立)中,力平台记录在最年长年龄组中存在地板效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验