Bauer Christoph, Gröger Ines, Rupprecht Roland, Gassmann Karl Günter
Department of Geriatrics and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Waldkrankenhaus St Marien, Erlangen, Germany.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Oct;89(10):1977-82. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.033.
To investigate the intrasession reliability of center of pressure (COP) parameters calculated from force platform measurements.
A cross-sectional study.
Gait and balance laboratory.
Community-dwelling healthy older adults (N=63) above the age of 62 years (mean age, 78.74 y).
Not applicable.
COP was estimated from a force platform, and the following parameters were calculated: (1) the total length of the COP displacement, (2) area of sway, (3) length of the COP displacement in the sagittal plane, and (4) length of the COP displacement in the frontal plane. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated by using 3 successive trials with 4 different test conditions. The test conditions were (1) normative standing with eyes open, (2) normative standing with eyes closed, (3) narrow stance with eyes open, and (4) narrow stance with eyes closed.
The ICCs for the tests with eyes closed (.710-.946) were higher than those for tests with eyes open (.841-.945). The highest value was obtained for the vector sum of the COP during anteroposterior movement in narrow stance with eyes closed (.946). The value .710 was the lowest of all parameters and was an outlier for the narrow stance with eyes closed test, which was otherwise very reliable.
Eight of 16 calculated ICCs showed excellent reliability (>.90). They can be recommended for further use in clinical trials. Tests with closed eyes were more reliable than tests with eyes open. We recommend using eyes closed test conditions when assessing static balance control. For these tests, all the calculated ICCs were over .90, except for measurements of sway area.
研究通过测力平台测量计算得出的压力中心(COP)参数在同一疗程内的可靠性。
横断面研究。
步态与平衡实验室。
62岁以上(平均年龄78.74岁)的社区健康老年人(N = 63)。
不适用。
通过测力平台估算COP,并计算以下参数:(1)COP位移的总长度,(2)摆动面积,(3)矢状面内COP位移的长度,以及(4)额状面内COP位移的长度。使用4种不同测试条件下的3次连续试验计算组内相关系数(ICC)。测试条件为:(1)睁眼正常站立,(2)闭眼正常站立,(3)睁眼窄站,以及(4)闭眼窄站。
闭眼测试的ICC(0.710 - 0.946)高于睁眼测试的ICC(0.841 - 0.945)。闭眼窄站时前后移动过程中COP矢量和的值最高(0.946)。0.710是所有参数中最低的值,是闭眼窄站测试的一个异常值,该测试在其他方面非常可靠。
16个计算得出的ICC中有8个显示出极佳的可靠性(> 0.90)。它们可推荐用于进一步的临床试验。闭眼测试比睁眼测试更可靠。我们建议在评估静态平衡控制时使用闭眼测试条件。对于这些测试,除了摆动面积测量外,所有计算得出的ICC均超过0.90。