Suppr超能文献

母乳喂养或母乳用于新生儿程序性疼痛。

Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates.

作者信息

Shah P S, Aliwalas L I, Shah V

机构信息

University of Toronto, Department of Paediatrics and Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Rm 775A, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1XB.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD004950. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004950.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physiological changes brought about by pain may contribute to the development of morbidity in neonates. Clinical studies have shown reduction in the changes in physiological parameters and pain score measurements following pre-emptive analgesic administration in situations where the neonate is experiencing pain or stress. Nonpharmacological measures (such as holding, swaddling, breastfeeding) and pharmacological measures (such as acetaminophen, sucrose and opioids) have been used for this purpose.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of breastfeeding or supplemental breast milk in reducing procedural pain in neonates. The secondary objective was to conduct subgroup analyses based on the type of control intervention, type of painful procedure, gestational age and the amount of supplemental breast milk given.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE (1966 - Feb 2006), EMBASE (1980 - Feb 2006), CINAHL (1982 - Feb 2006), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 4, 2005 of Cochrane Library), abstracts from the annual meetings of the Society for Pediatric Research (1994 - 2006) and major pediatric pain conference proceedings. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of breastfeeding or supplemental breast milk versus no treatment/other measures in neonates were eligible for inclusion in this review. The study must have reported on either physiologic markers of pain or validated pain scores.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The methodological quality of the trials was assessed using the information provided in the studies and by personal communication with the authors. Data on relevant outcomes were extracted and the effect size was estimated and reported as relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and weighted mean difference (MD) as appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven eligible studies were identified. Marked heterogeneity in terms of control intervention and pain assessment measures were noted among the studies. Neonates in the breastfeeding group had statistically significantly less increase in the heart rate, reduced proportion of crying time and reduced duration of crying compared to swaddled group or pacifier group. Neonates in the breastfeeding group had a significant reduction in duration of crying compared to fasting (no intervention) group, but there was no significant difference when compared to glucose group. Premature Infant Pain Profile scores were significantly different between the breastfeeding group when compared to placebo group and the group positioned in mother's arms. However, these scores were not statistically significantly different in the breastfeeding group when compared to the no treatment group and the glucose group. Douleur Aigue Nouveau-ne scores were significantly different in the breastfeeding group when compared to the placebo group and the group positioned in mother's arms, but not when compared to the glucose group. Neonates in the supplemental breast milk group had significantly less increase in the heart rate and Neonatal Facial Coding Score compared to the placebo group. The differences in the duration of crying time and oxygen saturation change between supplemental breast milk group and the placebo group were not statistically significant. Neonates in the supplemental breast milk group had significantly higher increase in the heart rate changes and duration of crying time compared to glucose/sucrose group. No study was identified that has evaluated safety/effectiveness of repeated administration of breastfeeding or supplemental breast milk for pain relief.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: If available, breastfeeding or breast milk should be used to alleviate procedural pain in neonates undergoing a single painful procedure compared to placebo, positioning or no intervention. Administration of glucose/sucrose had similar effectiveness as breastfeeding for reducing pain. The effectiveness of breast milk for repeated painful procedures is not established and further research is needed. These studies should include various control interventions including glucose/ sucrose and should target preterm neonates.

摘要

背景

疼痛引起的生理变化可能促使新生儿发病。临床研究表明,在新生儿经历疼痛或应激的情况下,预先给予镇痛剂后,生理参数变化和疼痛评分测量值会降低。非药物措施(如怀抱、包裹、母乳喂养)和药物措施(如对乙酰氨基酚、蔗糖和阿片类药物)已用于此目的。

目的

本综述的主要目的是评估母乳喂养或补充母乳在减轻新生儿程序性疼痛方面的有效性。次要目的是根据对照干预类型、疼痛程序类型、胎龄和补充母乳量进行亚组分析。

检索策略

使用MEDLINE(1966年 - 2006年2月)、EMBASE(1980年 - 2006年2月)、CINAHL(1982年 - 2006年2月)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(Cochrane图书馆2005年第4期)、儿科学会年会摘要(1994年 - 2006年)以及主要儿科疼痛会议论文集进行文献检索工作。未设语言限制。

入选标准

母乳喂养或补充母乳与新生儿不治疗/其他措施对比的随机或半随机对照试验符合本综述纳入标准。该研究必须报告疼痛的生理指标或经过验证的疼痛评分。

数据收集与分析

利用研究中提供的信息并通过与作者的个人沟通来评估试验的方法学质量。提取相关结局的数据,并酌情估计效应量并报告为相对风险(RR)、风险差异(RD)和加权均数差(MD)。

主要结果

共识别出11项符合条件的研究。研究之间在对照干预和疼痛评估措施方面存在明显的异质性。与包裹组或安抚奶嘴组相比,母乳喂养组新生儿的心率增加在统计学上显著较少,哭闹时间比例降低,哭闹持续时间缩短。与禁食(无干预)组相比,母乳喂养组新生儿的哭闹持续时间显著缩短,但与葡萄糖组相比无显著差异。与安慰剂组和置于母亲怀抱组相比,母乳喂养组的早产儿疼痛量表评分有显著差异。然而,与不治疗组和葡萄糖组相比,母乳喂养组的这些评分在统计学上无显著差异。与安慰剂组和置于母亲怀抱组相比,母乳喂养组的急性新生儿疼痛评分有显著差异,但与葡萄糖组相比无差异。与安慰剂组相比,补充母乳组新生儿的心率增加和新生儿面部编码评分显著较低。补充母乳组与安慰剂组之间哭闹时间和血氧饱和度变化持续时间的差异无统计学意义。与葡萄糖/蔗糖组相比,补充母乳组新生儿的心率变化增加和哭闹时间持续时间显著更高。未发现评估重复给予母乳喂养或补充母乳以缓解疼痛的安全性/有效性的研究。

作者结论

与安慰剂、怀抱或不干预相比,若条件允许,母乳喂养或母乳应被用于减轻接受单次疼痛程序的新生儿的程序性疼痛。给予葡萄糖/蔗糖在减轻疼痛方面与母乳喂养具有相似的效果。母乳对重复疼痛程序的有效性尚未确立,需要进一步研究。这些研究应包括各种对照干预措施,包括葡萄糖/蔗糖,并应以早产儿为目标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验