• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的联合化疗

Combination chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumour.

作者信息

Xue Y, Zhang J, Wu T X, An R F

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD005196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005196.pub2.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD005196.pub2
PMID:16856085
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) includes gestational trophoblastic tumour and hydatidiform mole. Many women of reproductive age are affected by this disease although its incidence differs by geographical location. A number of chemotherapy regimens are used for treating the disease, such as methotrexate, actinomycin D and cyclophosphamide (MAC), methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, melphalan, hydroxyurea and vincristine (CHAMOC), etoposide, methotrexate and actinomycin (EMA) plus cyclophosphamide and vincristine (CO) (EMA-CO), etoposide, methotrexate and actinomycin (EMA) plus etoposide and cisplatin(EP) (EMA-EP). The efficacy of these drugs has not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy in treating high-risk GTT.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMB, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and CBM were carried out. Four journals were handsearched and other searching methods were used for identifying more studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of combination chemotherapy for treating high-risk GTT. Patients with placental-site trophoblastic tumour (PSTT), who had received chemotherapy in the previous two weeks, or patients with chemotherapy intolerance were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two investigators independently collected data using a data extraction form. Meta-analysis was not performed and the review was conducted as a narrative review.

MAIN RESULTS

One study with 42 participants was included in this review. It indicated that a MAC regimen was better than a CHAMOCA regimen for high-risk GTT because of lower toxicity. The quality of the study was unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The methodological limitations of the included study prevent any firm conclusions about the best combination chemotherapy regimen for high-risk GTT. High quality studies are required.

摘要

背景

妊娠滋养细胞疾病(GTD)包括妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤和葡萄胎。尽管其发病率因地理位置而异,但许多育龄妇女受此疾病影响。多种化疗方案用于治疗该疾病,如甲氨蝶呤、放线菌素D和环磷酰胺(MAC)、甲氨蝶呤、放线菌素D、环磷酰胺、阿霉素、美法仑、羟基脲和长春新碱(CHAMOC)、依托泊苷、甲氨蝶呤和放线菌素(EMA)加环磷酰胺和长春新碱(CO)(EMA - CO)、依托泊苷、甲氨蝶呤和放线菌素(EMA)加依托泊苷和顺铂(EP)(EMA - EP)。这些药物的疗效尚未得到系统评价。

目的

确定联合化疗治疗高危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTT)的疗效和安全性。

检索策略

对MEDLINE、EMB、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)进行了电子检索。手工检索了4种期刊,并采用其他检索方法来识别更多研究。

选择标准

该综述纳入了治疗高危GTT的联合化疗的随机对照试验(RCT)或半随机对照试验。排除在过去两周内接受过化疗的胎盘部位滋养细胞肿瘤(PSTT)患者或化疗不耐受患者。

数据收集与分析

两名研究者使用数据提取表独立收集数据。未进行荟萃分析,该综述以叙述性综述的形式进行。

主要结果

本综述纳入了一项有42名参与者的研究。结果表明,对于高危GTT,MAC方案因毒性较低而优于CHAMOCA方案。该研究的质量尚不清楚。

作者结论

纳入研究的方法学局限性使得无法就高危GTT的最佳联合化疗方案得出任何确凿结论。需要高质量的研究。

相似文献

1
Combination chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumour.高危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的联合化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD005196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005196.pub2.
2
Combination chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumour.高危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的联合化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD005196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005196.pub3.
3
Combination chemotherapy for primary treatment of high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumour.联合化疗用于高危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的初始治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD005196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005196.pub4.
4
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Chemotherapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer.激素难治性前列腺癌的化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD005247. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005247.pub2.
7
Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas.基于吉西他滨的晚期胆管癌化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 6;4(4):CD011746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011746.pub2.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical analysis and management of gestational trophoblastic diseases: a 90 cases study.妊娠滋养细胞疾病的临床分析与管理:一项90例病例研究
Int J Biomed Sci. 2009 Dec;5(4):321-5.
2
Successful pregnancy after chemotherapy for choriocarcinoma.绒毛膜癌化疗后成功妊娠。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012 Apr;62(2):197-8. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0133-0. Epub 2012 Apr 25.