Suppr超能文献

全口超声清创与疾病复发风险:1年随访

Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement and risk of disease recurrence: a 1-year follow-up.

作者信息

Tomasi Cristiano, Bertelle Alberto, Dellasega Ester, Wennström Jan L

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2006 Sep;33(9):626-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00962.x. Epub 2006 Jul 20.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the incidence of disease recurrence following a full-mouth pocket/root debridement approach with ultrasonic instrumentation versus that following a traditional approach of quadrant-wise scaling and root planing (Q-SRP) performed with hand instrumentation.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients were re-examined 1 year after the completion of a 6-month clinical trial comparing two different treatment protocols: a 1-h session of full-mouth ultrasonic debridement (UD--19 patients) or four sessions of Q-SRP with hand instruments (Q-SRP--18 patients). At 3 months, re-instrumentation was performed of pockets showing a remaining probing pocket depth (PPD) of > or =5 mm using the same type of instruments as used during the initial treatment phase. The clinical examinations comprised assessments of plaque, bleeding on probing (BoP) and PPD. The primary outcome variable was the incidence of recurrent diseased sites (i.e., sites showing PPD > or =5 mm and BoP+) between the post-treatment and 1-year follow-up examinations. All sites that were healed (PPD < or =4 mm and BoP(-)) at the post-treatment examination were included in the study sample, with a mean number of sites per patient of 23.5.

RESULTS

In the UD group, 29 (7%) out of 430 initially healed sites showed disease recurrence at the 1-year follow-up examination compared with 47 (11%) of 440 sites in the Q-SRP group (p>0.05). Twelve patients (63%) in the UD group presented recurrent diseased pockets, compared with 14 patients (78%) in the Q-SRP group. Two or more recurrent, diseased pockets were observed in nine patients in the UD group versus 11 in the Q-SRP group. All but one of the smokers belonged to the group of patients presenting recurrences. A tendency towards a higher mean plaque score was observed for the patients with recurrent sites.

CONCLUSION

The study revealed no significant difference in the incidence of recurrence of diseased periodontal pockets between the full-mouth UD approach and the traditional approach of Q-SRP.

摘要

目的

评估采用超声器械进行全口袋/根面清创术与采用手动器械进行传统象限刮治和根面平整术(Q-SRP)后疾病复发的发生率。

方法

在一项为期6个月的比较两种不同治疗方案的临床试验完成1年后,对37例患者进行复查:1小时的全口超声清创术(UD组——19例患者)或四次手动器械Q-SRP治疗(Q-SRP组——18例患者)。在3个月时,使用与初始治疗阶段相同类型的器械,对探诊袋深度(PPD)≥5 mm的袋进行再次治疗。临床检查包括对菌斑、探诊出血(BoP)和PPD的评估。主要结局变量是治疗后至1年随访检查期间疾病复发部位(即PPD≥5 mm且BoP+的部位)的发生率。所有在治疗后检查时愈合(PPD≤4 mm且BoP(-))的部位都纳入研究样本,每位患者的部位平均数为23.5个。

结果

在UD组中,430个最初愈合的部位中有29个(7%)在1年随访检查时出现疾病复发,而Q-SRP组440个部位中有47个(11%)出现复发(p>0.05)。UD组中有12例患者(63%)出现复发病袋,而Q-SRP组中有14例患者(78%)出现复发病袋。UD组有9例患者观察到两个或更多复发病袋,Q-SRP组有11例。除1名吸烟者外,所有吸烟者都属于出现复发的患者组。复发部位的患者平均菌斑评分有升高趋势。

结论

该研究表明,全口UD方法与传统的Q-SRP方法在牙周袋疾病复发发生率上无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验