Yanada Masamitsu, Matsushita Tadashi, Suzuki Momoko, Kiyoi Hitoshi, Yamamoto Koji, Kinoshita Tomohiro, Kojima Tetsuhito, Saito Hidehiko, Naoe Tomoki
Department of Hematology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Eur J Haematol. 2006 Oct;77(4):282-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2006.00711.x. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
Although there are two major scoring systems for the clinical diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), the validity of these systems for leukemia-associated DIC remains to be confirmed.
By analyzing 125 newly diagnosed acute leukemia patients, we investigated clinical and laboratory features of leukemia-associated DIC, and determined the validity of the two established criteria.
A total of 36 patients (29%) were diagnosed with DIC according to expert opinion, a method regarded as the de facto gold standard. Leukemia-associated DIC is characterized by rare manifestation of organ failure because of thrombosis and no relevance of the platelet count for the diagnosis. The results of receiver operating characteristics analysis favored fibrin degradation product (FDP) rather than D-dimer as the fibrin-related marker test. Although prothrombin time, plasma fibrinogen, and serum FDP levels were significantly different for patients with and without DIC, multivariate analysis identified FDP levels to be the only factor associated with DIC diagnosis. The cut-off level of 15 microg/mL for FDP was found to be the most effective to differentiate DIC from non-DIC, resulting in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 96%, respectively. The diagnostic results for our patients produced with this FDP-based system were at least comparable with or superior to those obtained with the two currently available scoring systems.
Our findings suggest that an FDP-based criterion may be applicable for the diagnosis of leukemia-associated DIC. Although it appears to be simple and practicable enough for clinical use, prospective validation of this criterion is needed.
尽管有两种主要的评分系统用于弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)的临床诊断,但这些系统对白血病相关DIC的有效性仍有待证实。
通过分析125例新诊断的急性白血病患者,我们研究了白血病相关DIC的临床和实验室特征,并确定了两种既定标准的有效性。
根据专家意见,共有36例患者(29%)被诊断为DIC,专家意见被视为事实上的金标准。白血病相关DIC的特征是因血栓形成导致器官衰竭的表现罕见,且血小板计数与诊断无关。受试者工作特征分析结果显示,纤维蛋白降解产物(FDP)比D-二聚体更适合作为纤维蛋白相关标志物检测。尽管凝血酶原时间、血浆纤维蛋白原和血清FDP水平在有或无DIC的患者中存在显著差异,但多变量分析确定FDP水平是与DIC诊断相关的唯一因素。发现FDP的临界值为15μg/mL时,区分DIC与非DIC最为有效,诊断敏感性和特异性分别为92%和96%。使用基于FDP的系统对我们的患者进行诊断的结果至少与目前可用的两种评分系统相当或更优。
我们的研究结果表明,基于FDP的标准可能适用于白血病相关DIC的诊断。尽管它似乎简单且切实可行,足以用于临床,但仍需要对该标准进行前瞻性验证。