Coche Emmanuel, Vynckier Stefaan, Octave-Prignot Michelle
Departments of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Radiology. 2006 Sep;240(3):690-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2402050580. Epub 2006 Jul 20.
To compare radiation dose delivered at four- and 16-detector row computed tomography (CT) with a dose-modulation program and that delivered at digital angiography for evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE).
The part of the study involving patients (seven women, four men; mean age, 62 years +/- 16 [standard deviation]; range, 41-85 years) was approved by the institutional review board. Patients gave written informed consent. Exposure was performed with an anthropomorphic phantom with thermoluminescent dosimeters for four-detector row CT without the dose-modulation program and 16-detector row CT without and with the dose-modulation program with standard protocols for pulmonary CT angiography (120 kV, 144 mAs, four and 16 detector rows with 1.00- and 0.75-mm section thickness, respectively). Digital angiograms were acquired with four standard projections at 80 kV. For digital angiography, radiation dose was calculated according to phantom measurements and adapted to acquisition and fluoroscopy times. Distribution of dose was compared for CT and digital angiography.
During pulmonary CT angiography, mean radiation dose delivered at middle of chest was 21.5, 19.5, and 18.2 mGy for four-detector row CT and for 16-detector row CT without and with dose-modulation program, respectively. At the same level, a mean dose of 91 mGy was delivered with digital angiography. The dose adjusted to clinical conditions was 139.0 mGy for digital angiography and could be reduced after technical adjustment. Ratios of maximum dose to mean dose were 1.15 and 2.96 for CT and digital angiography, respectively. With application of the dose-modulation program at 16-detector row CT, radiation dose was reduced 15%-20% at the upper chest.
Multi-detector row CT delivers a lower radiation dose, with better spatial distribution of dose, than does pulmonary digital [corrected] angiography. With 16-detector row CT and a dose-modulation program, radiation dose is decreased during PE work-up.
比较采用剂量调制程序的四排和十六排螺旋CT在评估肺栓塞(PE)时的辐射剂量与数字血管造影时的辐射剂量。
本研究涉及患者部分(7名女性,4名男性;平均年龄62岁±16[标准差];范围41 - 85岁)经机构审查委员会批准。患者签署了书面知情同意书。使用带有热释光剂量计的人体模型进行曝光,分别对未采用剂量调制程序的四排螺旋CT、未采用和采用剂量调制程序的十六排螺旋CT进行肺CT血管造影标准方案(120 kV,144 mAs,四排和十六排探测器,层厚分别为1.00和0.75 mm)扫描。在80 kV下获取四个标准投影的数字血管造影图像。对于数字血管造影,根据模型测量计算辐射剂量,并根据采集和透视时间进行调整。比较CT和数字血管造影的剂量分布情况。
在肺CT血管造影过程中,四排螺旋CT、未采用剂量调制程序的十六排螺旋CT以及采用剂量调制程序的十六排螺旋CT在胸部中部的平均辐射剂量分别为21.5、19.5和18.2 mGy。在同一水平,数字血管造影的平均剂量为91 mGy。根据临床情况调整后的数字血管造影剂量为139.0 mGy,经技术调整后可降低。CT和数字血管造影的最大剂量与平均剂量之比分别为1.15和2.96。在十六排螺旋CT上应用剂量调制程序后,上胸部的辐射剂量降低了15% - 20%。
多排螺旋CT比肺部数字血管造影的辐射剂量更低,且剂量的空间分布更好。采用十六排螺旋CT和剂量调制程序时,在肺栓塞检查过程中辐射剂量会降低。