McCollough Cynthia H, Primak Andrew N, Saba Osama, Bruder Herbert, Stierstorfer Karl, Raupach Rainer, Suess Christoph, Schmidt Bernhard, Ohnesorge Bernd M, Flohr Thomas G
CT Clinical Innovation Center, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):775-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2433061165. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
To prospectively compare the dose performance of a 64-channel multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) scanner and a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner from the same manufacturer.
To minimize dose in the cardiac (dual-source) mode, the evaluated dual-source CT system uses a cardiac beam-shaping filter, three-dimensional adaptive noise reduction, heart rate-dependent pitch, and electrocardiographically based modulation of the tube current. Weighted CT dose index per 100 mAs was measured for the head, body, and cardiac beam-shaping filters. Kerma-length product was measured in the spiral cardiac mode at four pitch values and three electrocardiographic modulation temporal windows. Noise was measured in an anthropomorphic phantom. Data were compared with data from a 64-channel multi-detector row CT scanner.
For the multi-detector row and dual-source CT systems, respectively, weighted CT dose index per 100 mAs was 14.2 and 12.2 mGy (head CT), 6.8 and 6.4 mGy (body CT), and 6.8 and 5.3 mGy (cardiac CT). In the spiral cardiac mode (no electrocardiographically based tube current modulation, 0.2 pitch), equivalent noise occurred at volume CT dose index values of 23.7 and 35.0 mGy (coronary artery calcium CT) and 58.9 and 61.2 mGy (coronary CT angiography) for multi-detector row CT and dual-source CT, respectively. The use of heart rate-dependent pitch values reduced volume CT dose index to 46.2 mGy (0.265 pitch), 34.0 mGy (0.36 pitch), and 26.6 mGy (0.46 pitch) compared with 61.2 mGy for 0.2 pitch. The use of electrocardiographically based tube current-modulation and temporal windows of 110, 210, and 310 msec further reduced volume CT dose index to 9.1-25.1 mGy, dependent on the heart rate.
For electrocardiographically gated coronary CT angiography, image noise equivalent to that of multi-detector row CT can be achieved with dual-source CT at doses comparable to or up to a factor of two lower than the doses at multi-detector row CT, depending on heart rate of the patient.
前瞻性比较同一制造商生产的64排多层螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描仪和64排双源CT扫描仪的剂量性能。
为了在心脏(双源)模式下使剂量最小化,所评估的双源CT系统采用了心脏束流整形滤波器、三维自适应降噪、心率依赖螺距以及基于心电图的管电流调制。测量了头部、体部和心脏束流整形滤波器的每100mAs加权CT剂量指数。在螺旋心脏模式下,于四个螺距值和三个心电图调制时间窗测量比释动能长度乘积。在仿真人体模型中测量噪声。将数据与64排多层螺旋CT扫描仪的数据进行比较。
对于多层螺旋CT系统和双源CT系统,每100mAs加权CT剂量指数分别为:头部CT为14.2和12.2mGy,体部CT为6.8和6.4mGy,心脏CT为6.8和5.3mGy。在螺旋心脏模式下(无基于心电图的管电流调制,螺距0.2),多层螺旋CT和双源CT在容积CT剂量指数值分别为23.7和35.0mGy(冠状动脉钙化CT)以及58.9和61.2mGy(冠状动脉CT血管造影)时出现等效噪声。与螺距0.2时的61.2mGy相比,采用心率依赖螺距值可使容积CT剂量指数降至46.2mGy(螺距0.265)、34.0mGy(螺距0.36)和26.6mGy(螺距0.46)。采用基于心电图的管电流调制以及110、210和310毫秒的时间窗可进一步将容积CT剂量指数降至9.1 - 25.1mGy,具体取决于心率。
对于基于心电图门控的冠状动脉CT血管造影,双源CT能够在与多层螺旋CT相当或低至其剂量一半(取决于患者心率)的情况下,获得与多层螺旋CT等效的图像噪声。