Haslam Nick
Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(3):252-64. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4.
The concept of dehumanization lacks a systematic theoretical basis, and research that addresses it has yet to be integrated. Manifestations and theories of dehumanization are reviewed, and a new model is developed. Two forms of dehumanization are proposed, involving the denial to others of 2 distinct senses of humanness: characteristics that are uniquely human and those that constitute human nature. Denying uniquely human attributes to others represents them as animal-like, and denying human nature to others represents them as objects or automata. Cognitive underpinnings of the "animalistic" and "mechanistic" forms of dehumanization are proposed. An expanded sense of dehumanization emerges, in which the phenomenon is not unitary, is not restricted to the intergroup context, and does not occur only under conditions of conflict or extreme negative evaluation. Instead, dehumanization becomes an everyday social phenomenon, rooted in ordinary social-cognitive processes.
去人性化的概念缺乏系统的理论基础,且针对这一概念的研究尚未整合。本文回顾了去人性化的表现形式和理论,并提出了一个新模型。文中提出了两种去人性化形式,涉及剥夺他人两种不同的人性感知:独特的人类特征和构成人性的特征。将独特的人类属性剥夺给他人,会将他们表现为动物般的;而将人性剥夺给他人,则会将他们表现为物体或自动机器。文中还提出了去人性化“兽性化”和“机械化”形式的认知基础。一种更广泛的去人性化概念出现了,其中这一现象并非单一的,不限于群体间情境,也并非仅在冲突或极端负面评价的情况下才会发生。相反,去人性化成为一种日常社会现象,植根于普通的社会认知过程。