Departamento de Psicología Social, Facultad de Psicología, Campus de Cartuja s/n. 18011 - Granada, Spain.
Span J Psychol. 2012 Nov;15(3):1110-22. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n3.39401.
The present research deals with two forms of dehumanization: 1) denying uniquely human attributes to others (seeing them as animals); 2) denying human nature to others (seeing them as machines or automata). Studies 1 and 2 explored these two forms of dehumanization, analyzing whether people associated their ingroup more with human-related words (vs. animal- vs. machine-related words) than two different outgroups. A paper and pencil procedure was used to find out which words were associated with the surnames of the ingroup (Spaniards) or the outgroup (Germans, Gypsies). Results showed that participants were more ready to link ingroup than outgroup surnames to human words. They also linked more Gypsy surnames to animal-related words and German surnames with machine-related words. Studies 3 and 4 used the Implicit Association Test to analyze the same ideas and replicated the results of Studies 1 and 2.
1）否认他人具有独特的人类属性（将他们视为动物）；2）否认他人具有人性（将他们视为机器或自动机）。研究 1 和 2 探讨了这两种去人性化形式，分析了人们是否更倾向于将与自己所属群体相关的词汇（与动物相关的词汇与机器相关的词汇相比）与两个不同的外群体相关联。通过纸笔程序，找出与所属群体（西班牙人）或外群体（德国人、吉普赛人）姓氏相关联的词汇。结果表明，参与者更倾向于将与自己所属群体相关的姓氏与人类相关的词汇联系起来，而不是将外群体的姓氏与之联系起来。他们还将更多的吉普赛姓氏与动物相关的词汇联系起来，而将德国姓氏与机器相关的词汇联系起来。研究 3 和 4 使用内隐联想测验分析了相同的观点，并复制了研究 1 和 2 的结果。
Zotero 插件