Suppr超能文献

在0.5%布比卡因硬膜外麻醉联合氧化亚氮镇静期间,脑电双频指数与观察者对警觉和镇静评分的评估不相关。

Bispectral index does not correlate with observer assessment of alertness and sedation scores during 0.5% bupivacaine epidural anesthesia with nitrous oxide sedation.

作者信息

Park Kyung Soo, Hur Eun Jin, Han Kyung Woo, Kil Ho Yeong, Han Tae Hyung

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2006 Aug;103(2):385-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000226090.13170.25.

Abstract

The bispectral index (BIS) has been used as a measure of the degree of sedation and level of hypnosis for IV hypnotics and sedatives, potent volatile anesthetics. We evaluated the effect of increasing concentrations of nitrous oxide (N2O) on BIS and compared it with the Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (OAA/S) scale in patients undergoing regional anesthesia. We studied 48 unpremedicated, ASA physical status I-II adult patients scheduled for lower extremity surgery under lumbar epidural anesthesia. N2O was given in oxygen to achieve measured end-tidal concentrations of 33%, 50%, and 67% N2O by a tight-fitting facemask, and each N2O concentration was maintained for 20 min. Paired measurements of BIS and OAA/S scores were obtained just before each increase in N2O concentration. Forty of the 48 subjects completed the study. Increasing N(2)O concentrations produced no changes in BIS despite a significant decrease in OAA/S scores at 50% and 67% N2O concentrations. The prediction probability for BIS and OAA/S calculated by Somers' d(x.y) were 0.60 and 0.84, respectively. Anesthesiologists should be aware that the BIS monitor may not be sensitive enough to provide an adequate measure of the depth of sedation and hypnosis when using N2O alone for sedation. It may be better to monitor sedation clinically (e.g., with the OAA/S scale) to determine the dose requirement and the adequacy of depth of sedation and hypnosis.

摘要

脑电双频指数(BIS)已被用作衡量静脉催眠药、镇静药以及强效挥发性麻醉药的镇静程度和催眠水平的指标。我们评估了增加氧化亚氮(N2O)浓度对BIS的影响,并将其与区域麻醉患者的观察者警觉与镇静评分(OAA/S)量表进行比较。我们研究了48例未接受术前用药、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I-II级、计划在腰段硬膜外麻醉下进行下肢手术的成年患者。通过紧密贴合的面罩给予N2O和氧气,以使呼气末N2O浓度达到33%、50%和67%,每个N2O浓度维持20分钟。在每次增加N2O浓度之前,对BIS和OAA/S评分进行配对测量。48名受试者中有40名完成了研究。尽管在N2O浓度为50%和67%时OAA/S评分显著降低,但增加N2O浓度并未使BIS发生变化。通过Somers'd(x,y)计算得出的BIS和OAA/S的预测概率分别为0.60和0.84。麻醉医生应意识到,单独使用N2O进行镇静时,BIS监测仪可能不够敏感,无法充分衡量镇静和催眠的深度。临床上监测镇静情况(如使用OAA/S量表)以确定剂量需求以及镇静和催眠深度的适宜性可能更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验