Suppr超能文献

不同浓度丙泊酚和右美托咪定镇静对脑电图模式的影响:清醒、中度镇静、深度镇静和恢复。

Different effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine sedation on electroencephalogram patterns: Wakefulness, moderate sedation, deep sedation and recovery.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Psychology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jun 19;13(6):e0199120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199120. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Sedation induces changes in electroencephalography (EEG) dynamics. However, the distinct EEG dynamic characteristics at comparable sedation levels have not been well studied, resulting in potential interpretation errors in EEG monitoring during sedation. We aimed to analyze the EEG dynamics of dexmedetomidine and propofol at comparable sedation levels and to explore EEG changes with increased sedation levels for each agent. We measured the Bispectral Index (BIS) and 20-channel EEG under dexmedetomidine and propofol sedation from wakefulness, moderate sedation, and deep sedation to recovery in healthy volunteers (n = 10) in a randomized, 2-day, crossover study. Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (OAA/S) score was used to assess sedation levels. Despite similar changes in increased delta oscillations, multiple differences in the EEG spatiotemporal dynamics were observed between these two agents. During moderate sedation, both dexmedetomidine and propofol induced increased spindle power; however, dexmedetomidine decreased the global alpha/beta/gamma power, whereas propofol decreased the alpha power in the occipital area and increased the global spindle/beta/gamma power. During deep sedation, dexmedetomidine was associated with increased fronto-central spindle power and decreased global alpha/beta/gamma power, but propofol was associated with increased theta/alpha/spindle/beta power, which was maximized in the frontal area. The transition of topographic alpha/spindle/beta power distribution from moderate sedation to deep sedation completely differed between these two agents. Our study demonstrated that there was a distinct hierarchy of EEG changes with increased sedation depths by propofol and dexmedetomidine. Differences in EEG dynamics at the same sedation level might account for differences in the BIS value and reflect the different sedation mechanisms. EEG-based clinical sedation monitoring should consider the effect of drug types on EEG dynamics.

摘要

镇静会引起脑电图(EEG)动态变化。然而,在可比镇静水平下,EEG 动态特征的差异尚未得到很好的研究,这可能导致镇静监测中 EEG 解释的错误。我们旨在分析右美托咪定和丙泊酚在可比镇静水平下的 EEG 动力学,并探讨每种药物镇静水平增加时的 EEG 变化。我们在一项健康志愿者(n = 10)的随机、2 天交叉研究中,在清醒、中度镇静和深度镇静至恢复期间,使用脑电双频指数(BIS)和 20 通道 EEG 测量右美托咪定和丙泊酚镇静。使用观察者警觉和镇静评分(OAA/S)评估镇静水平。尽管在增加的 delta 振荡方面有相似的变化,但在这两种药物之间观察到 EEG 时空动力学的多个差异。在中度镇静期间,右美托咪定和丙泊酚均诱导纺锤波功率增加;然而,右美托咪定降低了全局 alpha/beta/gamma 功率,而丙泊酚降低了枕区的 alpha 功率并增加了全局纺锤波/beta/gamma 功率。在深度镇静期间,右美托咪定与额-中央纺锤波功率增加和全局 alpha/beta/gamma 功率降低相关,而丙泊酚与 theta/alpha/纺锤波/beta 功率增加相关,该功率在前额区域达到最大值。从中度镇静到深度镇静,两种药物之间的地形图 alpha/纺锤波/beta 功率分布的转变完全不同。我们的研究表明,丙泊酚和右美托咪定在镇静深度增加时,EEG 变化存在明显的层次结构。同一镇静水平下 EEG 动力学的差异可能是由于 BIS 值的差异反映了不同的镇静机制。基于 EEG 的临床镇静监测应考虑药物类型对 EEG 动力学的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc9b/6007908/fefcdf096d56/pone.0199120.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验