O'Hara Jean
Estia Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, and the Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK. Jean.O'
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;19(5):497-501. doi: 10.1097/01.yco.0000238477.96775.16.
In our modern, performance managed National Health Service, quality has become a key target. Quality assurance has become a statutory duty and the National Health Service is inundated with policy documents and performance measures in most areas of mainstream healthcare. Performance against such measures will be monitored by powerful independent regulatory bodies. It is therefore timely to look at what specific quality measures there are for services for people with intellectual disability.
Tension exists as to the need for developing specific targets for the population with intellectual disabilities when the philosophy of care is for real social inclusion where 'all means all'. To what extent will existing quality standards for mental health services suffice when we know that often people with intellectual disabilities have real issues accessing these services? This paper highlights published quality measures and standards from primary care through mainstream secondary care and specialist mental health services. It also discusses the policy context and current development of regulatory standards as these continue to evolve.
Evidence for meeting quality standards will increasingly dominate the delivery and funding of healthcare in the National Health Service.
在我们现代的、实行绩效管理的国民医疗服务体系中,质量已成为关键目标。质量保证已成为一项法定义务,国民医疗服务体系在主流医疗保健的大多数领域充斥着政策文件和绩效指标。强大的独立监管机构将对这些指标的执行情况进行监测。因此,现在是时候审视针对智障人士服务的具体质量指标有哪些了。
当护理理念是实现真正的社会包容(即“所有人都意味着所有人”)时,对于为智障人群制定具体目标的必要性存在着矛盾。当我们知道智障人士在获取心理健康服务方面往往存在实际问题时,现有的心理健康服务质量标准在多大程度上足够呢?本文重点介绍了从初级保健到主流二级保健以及专科心理健康服务中已公布的质量指标和标准。它还讨论了政策背景以及监管标准的当前发展情况,因为这些仍在不断演变。
符合质量标准的证据将越来越多地主导国民医疗服务体系中医疗保健的提供和资金投入。