Chinn D, Abraham E
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Jun;60(6):571-82. doi: 10.1111/jir.12274. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
The Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service was established to address common mental health problems among the English population in a timely manner in order to counter the social and economic disadvantage accompanying such difficulties. Using the concept of candidacy, we examined how the legitimacy of claims by people with intellectual disabilities to use this service is facilitated or impeded.
We used a sequential mixed methods design. We completed 21 interviews with a range of stakeholders, including people with intellectual disabilities and their carers. Themes from the interviews were used to design an online survey questionnaire that was returned by 452 staff from IAPT and specialist intellectual disability services.
Using the candidacy framework, we noted that eligibility and access to IAPT were achieved through dynamic and iterative processes of negotiation involving people with intellectual disabilities and their supporters on one side and IAPT staff and service structures on the other. Barriers and facilitators were apparent throughout the seven dimensions of candidacy (identification, navigation, permeability of services, appearances, adjudications, offers and resistance and operating conditions) and were linked to discourses relating to the character and purpose of IAPT and specialist intellectual disability services.
Opportunities exist for some people with intellectual disabilities to assert their candidacy for IAPT input, although there are barriers at individual, professional, organisational and structural levels. More attention needs to be paid to how principles of inclusiveness are operationalised within IAPT teams and to the mental health facilitation role of specialist intellectual disability staff.
改善心理治疗可及性(IAPT)服务的设立,旨在及时解决英国人群中的常见心理健康问题,以应对此类困难所带来的社会和经济劣势。我们运用候选资格的概念,研究了智障人士使用该服务的诉求的合法性是如何得到促进或受到阻碍的。
我们采用了序列混合方法设计。我们对一系列利益相关者进行了21次访谈,其中包括智障人士及其照顾者。访谈得出的主题被用于设计一份在线调查问卷,该问卷由452名来自IAPT和专业智障服务机构的工作人员回复。
运用候选资格框架,我们注意到,通过智障人士及其支持者与IAPT工作人员及服务结构之间动态且反复的协商过程,实现了IAPT的资格认定和可及性。在候选资格的七个维度(识别、导航、服务的渗透性、表象、裁决、提议与阻力以及运作条件)中,障碍和促进因素都很明显,并且与有关IAPT及专业智障服务的性质和目的的话语相关联。
尽管在个人、专业、组织和结构层面存在障碍,但一些智障人士仍有机会主张其接受IAPT服务的候选资格。需要更加关注包容性原则在IAPT团队中的实施方式,以及专业智障服务人员在促进心理健康方面的作用。