• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

显著升级影响三分之一被诊断为前列腺癌的男性:预测列线图及内部验证。

Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer: predictive nomogram and internal validation.

作者信息

Chun Felix K-H, Briganti Alberto, Shariat Shahrokh F, Graefen Markus, Montorsi Francesco, Erbersdobler Andreas, Steuber Thomas, Salonia Andrea, Currlin Eike, Scattoni Vincenzo, Friedrich Martin G, Schlomm Thorsten, Haese Alexander, Michl Uwe, Colombo Renzo, Heinzer Hans, Valiquette Luc, Rigatti Patrizio, Roehrborn Claus G, Huland Hartwig, Karakiewicz Pierre I

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2006 Aug;98(2):329-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06262.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06262.x
PMID:16879673
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the rate of significant upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens in a contemporary cohort, and to develop a prognostic model capable of predicting the probability of significant upgrading, as previous reports indicate that up to 43% of men with low-grade prostate cancer at biopsy will be diagnosed with high-grade cancer at RP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study cohort comprised 4789 men (median age 63 years, range 39-82) treated with RP, with available clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen levels, biopsy and RP Gleason sum values. These variables were used as predictors in multivariate logistic regression models (LRMs) addressing the rate of significant Gleason sum upgrading, defined as a Gleason sum increase either from < or = 6 to > or = 7 or from 7 to > or = 8 between the biopsy and RP specimens. Regression coefficients were used to develop and validate (200 bootstrap re-samples) a nomogram predicting significant biopsy Gleason sum upgrading.

RESULTS

Significant biopsy Gleason sum upgrading was recorded in 1349 (28.2%) patients. In multivariate LRMs, all predictors were highly significant (all P < 0.001). The bootstrap-corrected accuracy of the nomogram predicting the probability of significant Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and RP specimens was 75.7%.

CONCLUSION

Our nomogram might prove highly useful when the possibility of a more aggressive Gleason variant could change the treatment options.

摘要

目的

在当代队列中探索活检标本与根治性前列腺切除术(RP)标本之间显著升级的发生率,并建立一个能够预测显著升级概率的预后模型,因为既往报告表明,活检时低级别前列腺癌患者中高达43%在RP时会被诊断为高级别癌症。

患者与方法

研究队列包括4789例接受RP治疗的男性(中位年龄63岁,范围39 - 82岁),有可用的临床分期、前列腺特异性抗原水平、活检及RP Gleason总分值。这些变量被用作多因素逻辑回归模型(LRMs)中的预测因子,该模型针对显著的Gleason总分升级率,定义为活检标本与RP标本之间Gleason总分从≤6增加到≥7或从7增加到≥8。回归系数用于建立并验证(200次自抽样重采样)一个预测活检Gleason总分显著升级的列线图。

结果

1349例(28.2%)患者记录到活检Gleason总分显著升级。在多因素LRMs中,所有预测因子均具有高度显著性(所有P < 0.001)。预测活检与RP标本之间Gleason总分显著升级概率的列线图经自抽样校正后的准确率为75.7%。

结论

当更具侵袭性的Gleason变异体的可能性可能改变治疗方案时,我们的列线图可能证明非常有用。

相似文献

1
Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer: predictive nomogram and internal validation.显著升级影响三分之一被诊断为前列腺癌的男性:预测列线图及内部验证。
BJU Int. 2006 Aug;98(2):329-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06262.x.
2
Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.预测前列腺穿刺活检与根治性前列腺切除术后病理结果之间前列腺癌Gleason评分升级概率的列线图的开发与内部验证。
Eur Urol. 2006 May;49(5):820-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.007. Epub 2005 Dec 22.
3
Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.活检组织条数量是低风险前列腺癌患者临床显著 Gleason 评分升级的最重要预测因素之一。
Urology. 2009 May;73(5):1087-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.048. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
4
External validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology among Japanese patients.验证预测日本患者前列腺癌活检和根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级概率的列线图的外部验证。
Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2):404-10. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.084. Epub 2009 Aug 29.
5
Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion based on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.基于盆腔淋巴结清扫范围预测临床局限性前列腺癌患者淋巴结侵犯概率的列线图的验证
BJU Int. 2006 Oct;98(4):788-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06318.x. Epub 2006 Jun 26.
6
Factors predicting prostatic biopsy Gleason sum under grading.预测前列腺活检 Gleason 评分的因素。
J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):118-22; discussion 123-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.127. Epub 2009 May 17.
7
Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy.Gleason评分升级的临床预测因素:对考虑密切观察、主动监测或近距离放射治疗的患者的影响。
Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;109(12):2432-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22712.
8
Is there a difference in outcome after radical prostatectomy between patients with biopsy Gleason sums 4, 5, and 6? Results from the SEARCH database.活检Gleason评分总和为4、5和6的患者在前列腺癌根治术后的结局是否存在差异?来自SEARCH数据库的结果。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2003;6(3):261-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500673.
9
Radical prostatectomy in men aged >or=70 years: effect of age on upgrading, upstaging, and the accuracy of a preoperative nomogram.70岁及以上男性的根治性前列腺切除术:年龄对病理升级、分期上调及术前列线图准确性的影响
BJU Int. 2008 Mar;101(5):541-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07410.x.
10
Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.通过增加经直肠活检针芯数量提高预测前列腺癌Gleason评分的准确性。
Urol Int. 2007;79(4):302-6. doi: 10.1159/000109713.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing Gleason score up/downgrade in radical prostatectomy.影响前列腺癌根治术中Gleason评分上调/下调的因素。
BMC Urol. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01848-x.
2
Urine biomarkers can predict prostate cancer and PI-RADS score prior to biopsy.尿液生物标志物可预测前列腺癌和活检前的 PI-RADS 评分。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 5;14(1):18148. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68026-1.
3
Prostate cancer nomograms and their application in Asian men: a review.前列腺癌列线图及其在亚洲男性中的应用:综述
Prostate Int. 2024 Mar;12(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
4
Grade Group accuracy is improved by extensive prostate biopsy sampling, but unrelated to prostatectomy specimen sampling or use of immunohistochemistry.前列腺活检样本的广泛采集可提高分级分组的准确性,但与前列腺切除术标本的采集或免疫组织化学无关。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2023 Jun 21;29:1611157. doi: 10.3389/pore.2023.1611157. eCollection 2023.
5
External Tertiary-Care-Hospital Validation of the Epidemiological SEER-Based Nomogram Predicting Downgrading in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy.基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)的列线图对接受根治性前列腺切除术的高危前列腺癌患者降级情况预测的外部三级医疗中心验证
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 3;13(9):1614. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091614.
6
Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Classification.机器学习算法在乳腺癌诊断与分类中的应用
Int J Sci Acad Res. 2021 Jan;2(1):3081-3086. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
7
Immunohistochemistry for Prostate Biopsy-Impact on Histological Prostate Cancer Diagnoses and Clinical Decision Making.前列腺活检的免疫组织化学——对组织学前列腺癌诊断和临床决策的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jun 9;28(3):2123-2133. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28030197.
8
Prognostic value of the pre-operative serum albumin to globulin ratio in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.术前血清白蛋白与球蛋白比值对接受根治性前列腺切除术的非转移性前列腺癌患者的预后价值。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep;26(9):1729-1735. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01952-6. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
9
The role of lymph node dissection in salvage radical prostatectomy for patients with radiation recurrent prostate cancer.淋巴结清扫在放疗后复发性前列腺癌患者挽救性根治性前列腺切除术中的作用。
Prostate. 2021 Aug;81(11):765-771. doi: 10.1002/pros.24173. Epub 2021 May 31.
10
The correlation between the gleason score of the biopsy and that of the prostatectomy patch.活检的Gleason评分与前列腺切除术组织块的Gleason评分之间的相关性。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Feb 26;63:102169. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.02.015. eCollection 2021 Mar.