Suppr超能文献

[血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂喹那普利、血管紧张素 II 受体拮抗剂缬沙坦长期治疗及喹那普利与缬沙坦联合治疗对中度慢性心力衰竭患者的影响。SADKO-CHF 研究的主要结果]

[Effects of long term therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor quinapril, antagonist of receptors to angiotensin II valsartan, and combination of quinapril and valsartan in patients with moderate chronic heart failure. Main results of the SADKO-CHF study].

作者信息

Skvortsov A A, Nasonova S N, Sychev A V, Orlova Ia A, Baklanova N A, Masenko V P, Mareev V Iu, Belenkov Iu N

出版信息

Kardiologiia. 2006;46(7):33-51.

Abstract

AIM

To compare effects of therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor quinapril (Q), angiotensin II receptor antagonist valsartan (V), and their combination in patients with stable moderate chronic heart failure (CHF).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients (n=80) with NYHA class II-III CHF due to ischemic heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy or decompensated hypertensive heart and ejection fraction <40% were randomized into 3 groups. Patients of group Q, V and Q+V received Q (average dose 13 mg/day, n=28), V (121 mg/day, n=26), and combination of Q and V (12 and 78 mg/day, n=26), respectively. Methods included assessment of clinical state and quality of life, echocardiography, 6 min walk test, Holter ECG monitoring with measurements of parameters of heart rate variability (HRV), and determination of neurohormones in peripheral blood. Examinations and measurements were made at baseline, in 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Six months therapy with Q, V and their combination resulted in improvement of clinical and functional state of patients. More pronounced augmentation of exercise tolerance and lowering of CHF functional class were observed in group Q. Combined use of Q and V had no significant advantages over monotherapy with Q and V when effect on parameters of left ventricular remodeling were concerned. Therapy with Q was associated with "escape" of blockade of aldosterone synthesis and "reactivation" of angiotensin II formation after 6 months. The use of V and combination of V+Q allowed to achieve more stable but incomplete control of aldosterone activity. The use of Q appears to be the preferential regimen to influence activity of sympathoadrenal system and parameters of 24 hour HRV compared with V and Q+V. Long term therapy with V does not improve main parameters of 24 hour HRV.

摘要

目的

比较血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂喹那普利(Q)、血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂缬沙坦(V)及其联合用药对稳定型中度慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者的疗效。

材料与方法

80例因缺血性心脏病、扩张型心肌病或失代偿性高血压性心脏病导致纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能II - III级且射血分数<40%的CHF患者被随机分为3组。Q组、V组和Q + V组患者分别接受Q(平均剂量13毫克/天,n = 28)、V(121毫克/天,n = 26)以及Q与V联合用药(12毫克和78毫克/天,n = 26)治疗。方法包括评估临床状态和生活质量、超声心动图检查、6分钟步行试验、动态心电图监测并测量心率变异性(HRV)参数,以及测定外周血中的神经激素。在基线、3个月和6个月时进行检查和测量。

结果与结论

Q、V及其联合用药治疗6个月可改善患者的临床和功能状态。Q组患者的运动耐量提高更为显著,CHF功能分级降低更为明显。在对左心室重构参数的影响方面,Q与V联合使用相较于Q和V单药治疗并无显著优势。Q治疗6个月后与醛固酮合成阻滞“逃逸”以及血管紧张素II形成“重新激活”相关。使用V以及V + Q联合用药可实现对醛固酮活性更稳定但不完全的控制。与V和Q + V相比,使用Q似乎是影响交感 - 肾上腺系统活性和24小时HRV参数的更优方案。长期使用V并不能改善24小时HRV的主要参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验