• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与者对促进身体活动的生活方式方法的看法:以赫尔河畔金斯敦的贫困社区为目标。

Participants' perceptions of a lifestyle approach to promoting physical activity: targeting deprived communities in Kingston-upon-Hull.

作者信息

Wormald Helen, Waters Heidi, Sleap Mike, Ingle Lee

机构信息

Specialist Health Promotion Service, Hull and East Riding Primary Care Trusts, Victoria House, Park Street, Kingston-upon-Hull, HU2 8TD, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2006 Aug 4;6:202. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-202.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-6-202
PMID:16889657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1560127/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The health benefits of an active lifestyle have been extensively documented and generally accepted. In the UK, declining physical activity levels are a major contributing factor to a number of public health concerns such as obesity and coronary heart disease. Clearly, there is an urgent need to support people in developing sustainable active lifestyles. In 2003, a new lifestyle-based physical activity service called Active Lifestyles (AL) was set up in Kingston-upon-Hull to help local residents to become more active and develop healthier lifestyles. The service targeted the most deprived communities in the city. The aim of the study was to explore participants' perceptions of the operation and effectiveness of the AL service.

METHODS

Five focus groups were conducted in community centres and offices in the health promotion service in Kingston-upon-Hull. Sixteen white adult males (n = 5) and females (n = 11) participated in the study. Ages ranged from 15-73 years (mean age = 53 years). Data were analysed using a content analysis technique based on the 'framework' approach.

RESULTS

Three broad themes emerged from the focus groups; the referral process; operational aspects of the AL service; and perceived benefits of the service. Overall, participants were extremely positive about the AL service. Many reported increased activity levels, modified eating habits, and enhanced awareness and education regarding healthier living. Most participants reported that local awareness of the AL service was low and greater promotion was required so more people could benefit. The success of the service was highly dependent upon the qualities and approach of the AL advisor.

CONCLUSION

The service appears to have filled a gap in service provision since it offered support to the most sedentary, older, unfit and overweight individuals, many of whom live in the most deprived parts of Kingston-upon-Hull. Traditional exercise referral schemes that focus solely on facility-based exercise should be broadened to encompass everyday lifestyle activity, where referral to a gym or exercise facility is just one of a number of physical activity options.

摘要

背景

积极生活方式对健康有益已得到广泛记载并被普遍认可。在英国,身体活动水平下降是肥胖和冠心病等诸多公共卫生问题的一个主要促成因素。显然,迫切需要支持人们养成可持续的积极生活方式。2003年,在赫尔河畔金斯顿设立了一项名为“积极生活方式”(AL)的新型基于生活方式的身体活动服务,以帮助当地居民更加积极并养成更健康的生活方式。该服务针对该市最贫困的社区。本研究的目的是探讨参与者对AL服务运作及成效的看法。

方法

在赫尔河畔金斯顿健康促进服务中心的社区中心和办公室开展了五次焦点小组讨论。16名成年白人男性(n = 5)和女性(n = 11)参与了研究。年龄范围为15至73岁(平均年龄 = 53岁)。使用基于“框架”方法的内容分析技术对数据进行分析。

结果

焦点小组讨论产生了三个广泛的主题;转诊流程;AL服务的运作方面;以及该服务的感知益处。总体而言,参与者对AL服务极为肯定。许多人报告称活动水平提高、饮食习惯改善,以及对更健康生活的认识和教育有所增强。大多数参与者报告称当地对AL服务的知晓度较低,需要加大推广力度,以便更多人能够受益。该服务的成功高度依赖于AL顾问的素质和方法。

结论

该服务似乎填补了服务提供方面的空白,因为它为最久坐不动、年龄较大、身体不健康和超重的人群提供了支持,其中许多人生活在赫尔河畔金斯顿最贫困的地区。应拓宽仅专注于基于设施的锻炼的传统运动转诊计划,以涵盖日常生活方式活动,其中转诊至健身房或运动设施只是多种身体活动选择之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c39f/1560127/4e8053fc2e6e/1471-2458-6-202-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c39f/1560127/4e8053fc2e6e/1471-2458-6-202-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c39f/1560127/4e8053fc2e6e/1471-2458-6-202-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Participants' perceptions of a lifestyle approach to promoting physical activity: targeting deprived communities in Kingston-upon-Hull.参与者对促进身体活动的生活方式方法的看法:以赫尔河畔金斯敦的贫困社区为目标。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Aug 4;6:202. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-202.
2
The Healthy Lifestyle Change Program: a pilot of a community-based health promotion intervention for adults with developmental disabilities.健康生活方式改变计划:一项基于社区的针对成人发育障碍者的健康促进干预的试点研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6 Suppl 1):S201-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.08.005.
3
Exercise referral: the public health panacea for physical activity promotion? A critical perspective of exercise referral schemes; their development and evaluation.运动转诊:促进身体活动的公共卫生万灵药?对运动转诊计划的批判性审视;其发展与评估。
Ergonomics. 2005;48(11-14):1390-410. doi: 10.1080/00140130500101544.
4
Promoting lifestyle self-awareness among the medical team by the use of an integrated teaching approach: a primary care experience.通过采用综合教学方法提高医疗团队的生活方式自我意识:基层医疗经验。
J Altern Complement Med. 2007 May;13(4):461-9. doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.6313.
5
Improving well-being through community health improvement: a service evaluation.通过社区卫生改善来提高幸福感:一项服务评估。
Perspect Public Health. 2013 Sep;133(5):272-9. doi: 10.1177/1757913913480292. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
6
What older people want: evidence from a study of remote Scottish communities.老年人想要什么:来自对苏格兰偏远社区的一项研究的证据。
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):1166. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
7
Postpartum Taiwanese women: their postpartum depression, social support and health-promoting lifestyle profiles.台湾产后女性:她们的产后抑郁、社会支持与健康促进生活方式概况。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Aug;16(8):1550-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01837.x.
8
Exploring participant appreciation of group-based principles for action in community-based physical activity programs for socially vulnerable groups in the Netherlands.探索荷兰社会弱势群体社区体育活动项目中参与者对基于群体的行动原则的认同情况。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Nov 25;15:1173. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2515-6.
9
A primary care lifestyle programme suitable for socioeconomically vulnerable groups - an observational study.一项适用于社会经济弱势群体的初级保健生活方式项目——一项观察性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Dec;34(4):352-359. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1248628.
10
Perceptions on healthy eating, physical activity and lifestyle advice: opportunities for adapting lifestyle interventions to individuals with low socioeconomic status.对健康饮食、体育活动及生活方式建议的认知:针对社会经济地位较低个体调整生活方式干预措施的机会。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 4;14:1036. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1036.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements and Innovation Trends of Information Technology Empowering Elderly Care Community Services Based on CiteSpace and VOSViewer.基于CiteSpace和VOSViewer的信息技术赋能老年护理社区服务的进展与创新趋势
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;13(13):1628. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131628.
2
Enablers and barriers to physical activity among older adults of low socio-economic status: a systematic review of qualitative literature.社会经济地位低下的老年人进行体育活动的促进因素和障碍:定性文献的系统综述
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jun 23;22(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01753-4.
3
What does the literature mean by social prescribing? A critical review using discourse analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomised controlled trial to examine the effects of a GP exercise referral programme in Hailsham, East Sussex, on modifiable coronary heart disease risk factors.一项随机对照试验,旨在研究东萨塞克斯郡海厄姆的一项全科医生运动转诊计划对可改变的冠心病风险因素的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Sep;52(9):595-601. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.9.595.
2
How much physical activity should we do? The case for moderate amounts and intensities of physical activity.我们应该进行多少体育活动?关于适量和中等强度体育活动的情况。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996 Jun;67(2):193-205. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1996.10607943.
3
A systematic review of physical activity promotion strategies.
文献中提到的“社会处方”是什么意思?运用话语分析的批判性回顾。
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Apr;44(4-5):848-868. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13468. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
4
Understanding the Experience of Service Users in an Integrated Care Programme for Obesity and Mental Health: A Qualitative Investigation of Total Wellbeing Luton.理解肥胖和心理健康综合护理计划中服务使用者的体验:卢顿整体健康定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 12;19(2):817. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020817.
5
Exercise Referral Instructors' Perspectives on Supporting and Motivating Participants to Uptake, Attend and Adhere to Exercise Prescription: A Qualitative Study.运动推荐指导员对支持和激励参与者接受、参加和坚持运动处方的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 25;19(1):203. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010203.
6
Multi-Stakeholder Retrospective Acceptability of a Peer Support Intervention for Exercise Referral.多利益相关者对运动转介同伴支持干预措施的回顾性可接受性评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 10;18(4):1720. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041720.
7
Functionality of Physical Activity Referral Schemes (PARS): A Systematic Review.体力活动推荐计划(PARS)的功能:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jun 25;8:257. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00257. eCollection 2020.
8
What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review.社会处方的实施途径有哪些?针对哪些人群?在什么情况下有效?一项实际情况综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Mar;28(2):309-324. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12839. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
The importance of service-users' perspectives: A systematic review of qualitative evidence reveals overlooked critical features of weight management programmes.服务使用者视角的重要性:系统评价的定性证据揭示了被忽视的体重管理项目的关键特征。
Health Expect. 2018 Jun;21(3):563-573. doi: 10.1111/hex.12657. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
10
Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants - what do providers and commissioners need to know? A systematic review of barriers and facilitators.参与者对运动转诊计划的依从性——提供者和委托方需要了解什么?对障碍因素和促进因素的系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2016 Mar 5;16:227. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2882-7.
一项关于身体活动促进策略的系统综述。
Br J Sports Med. 1996 Jun;30(2):84-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.30.2.84.
4
Adherence to exercise programmes. Recommendations.坚持锻炼计划。建议。
Sports Med. 1994 Jan;17(1):39-52. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199417010-00004.
5
Prescribing exercise in general practice. Evaluation of scheme exists in Stockport.在全科医疗中开具运动处方。斯托克波特存在对该方案的评估。
BMJ. 1994 Oct 1;309(6958):872-3.
6
'Advise yes, dictate no'. Patients' views on health promotion in the consultation.“建议可以,命令不行”。患者对咨询中健康促进的看法。
Fam Pract. 1990 Jun;7(2):125-31. doi: 10.1093/fampra/7.2.125.