• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床未感染阴茎假体上的生物膜形成

Biofilm formation on clinically noninfected penile prostheses.

作者信息

Silverstein Ari D, Henry Gerard D, Evans Brian, Pasmore Mark, Simmons Caroline J, Donatucci Craig F

机构信息

Hoard, Taub, Freedman and Rauch, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):1008-11. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.034.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.034
PMID:16890680
Abstract

PURPOSE

Biofilms are matrix enclosed bacterial populations that adhere to each other and/or to surfaces of implanted medical devices. Biofilm formation has consistently been demonstrated in association with infected penile prosthetic material. Clinically noninfected patients undergoing revision for mechanical malfunction have a surprisingly high rate of positive intraoperative cultures. After revision replacement prostheses have a higher rate of postoperative infection than first time implants. We characterized biofilm formation on penile prostheses in clinically noninfected patients undergoing revision surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients undergoing revision or removal of inflatable penile prosthetic devices due to mechanical malfunction were included. Specimens from the corporeal cylinders, scrotal pump and reservoir were analyzed. Bacterial biofilm coverage was detected and characterized using confocal scanning laser microscopy.

RESULTS

Bacterial biofilm formation associated with multiple microorganisms was demonstrated on 8 of 10 prostheses. Biofilms consisted of gram-positive rods, cocci and fungal elements.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of biofilm formation on these prosthetic devices suggests that most patients have bacterial coverage on the implant. Host mechanisms to control infection may lead to a homeostatic balance that enables biofilms to exist on the surface of the prosthesis without generating clinical infection. A critical threshold of biofilm extent may exist beyond which clinical infection may occur. These results justify further evaluation of biofilms and penile prosthesis infections. Furthermore, the findings help to explain why strategies such as mini salvage procedures to eliminate subclinical biofilms may decrease the postoperative infection risk in patients undergoing repair or replacement of penile prostheses.

摘要

目的

生物膜是被基质包裹的细菌群体,它们相互粘附和/或粘附于植入式医疗设备的表面。生物膜的形成一直被证明与感染的阴茎假体材料有关。临床上因机械故障接受翻修手术的未感染患者术中培养阳性率出奇地高。翻修更换假体后,术后感染率高于初次植入。我们对因机械故障接受翻修手术的临床上未感染患者阴茎假体上的生物膜形成进行了特征分析。

材料与方法

纳入10例因机械故障接受充气式阴茎假体装置翻修或取出的患者。对阴茎海绵体、阴囊泵和贮液器的标本进行分析。使用共聚焦扫描激光显微镜检测并表征细菌生物膜覆盖情况。

结果

10个假体中有8个显示出与多种微生物相关的细菌生物膜形成。生物膜由革兰氏阳性杆菌、球菌和真菌成分组成。

结论

这些假体装置上生物膜形成的程度表明,大多数患者的植入物上有细菌覆盖。宿主控制感染的机制可能导致一种稳态平衡,使生物膜能够在假体表面存在而不产生临床感染。可能存在一个生物膜范围的临界阈值,超过该阈值可能会发生临床感染。这些结果证明有必要进一步评估生物膜与阴茎假体感染。此外,这些发现有助于解释为什么诸如小型挽救手术以消除亚临床生物膜等策略可能会降低接受阴茎假体修复或更换患者的术后感染风险。

相似文献

1
Biofilm formation on clinically noninfected penile prostheses.临床未感染阴茎假体上的生物膜形成
J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):1008-11. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.034.
2
Revision washout decreases implant capsule tissue culture positivity: a multicenter study.翻修冲洗可降低植入物包膜组织培养阳性率:一项多中心研究。
J Urol. 2008 Jan;179(1):186-90; discussion 190. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.168. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
3
Revision washout decreases penile prosthesis infection in revision surgery: a multicenter study.翻修冲洗可降低阴茎假体翻修手术中的感染率:一项多中心研究。
J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):89-92. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000146717.62215.6f.
4
Risk of infection with an antibiotic coated penile prosthesis at device replacement for mechanical failure.因机械故障更换抗生素涂层阴茎假体时的感染风险。
J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2471-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.010.
5
Penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery: a multicenter study.阴茎假体翻修手术中的培养物:一项多中心研究。
J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):153-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132141.48587.f1.
6
Bacterial biofilms and implantable prosthetic devices.细菌生物膜与可植入假体装置
Int J Impot Res. 2003 Oct;15 Suppl 5:S150-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901093.
7
AMS 700 inflatable penile prosthesis with InhibiZone.AMS 700 可膨胀阴茎假体带 InhibiZone。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010 May;7(3):311-7. doi: 10.1586/erd.10.6.
8
Long-term infection outcomes of 3-piece antibiotic impregnated penile prostheses used in replacement implant surgery.3 件式抗生素浸渍阴茎假体在更换植入手术中的长期感染结局。
J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):899-903. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.116. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
9
Biofilm and Infectious Agents Present at the Time of Penile Prosthesis Revision Surgery: Times Are a Changing.在阴茎假体修复手术时出现的生物膜和感染因子:时代在变化。
Sex Med Rev. 2017 Apr;5(2):236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
10
Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of penile prosthesis infection.阴茎假体感染的诊断、治疗与预防
Int J Impot Res. 2003 Oct;15 Suppl 5:S139-46. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901091.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging strategies for the prevention of bacterial biofilm in prosthetic surgery.预防假体手术中细菌生物膜形成的新策略
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 May 31;13(5):833-845. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-550. Epub 2024 May 7.
2
Comment on: does time of intraoperative exposure to the aerobiome increase microbial growth on inflatable penile prostheses?关于《术中暴露于空气微生物群落的时间是否会增加可膨胀阴茎假体上的微生物生长?》的评论
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan;37(1):97-98. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00909-3. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
3
The "Minimal-Touch" Technique for Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement: Description and Outcomes.
人工尿道括约肌置入的“微创”技术:描述与结果
Urol Res Pract. 2023 Jan;49(1):40-47. doi: 10.5152/tud.2023.22136.
4
A scoping review of penile implant biofilms-what do we know and what remains unknown?阴茎植入物生物膜的范围综述——我们知道什么以及仍未知什么?
Transl Androl Urol. 2022 Aug;11(8):1210-1221. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-195.
5
Environmental, Microbiological, and Immunological Features of Bacterial Biofilms Associated with Implanted Medical Devices.植入医疗器械相关细菌生物膜的环境、微生物学和免疫学特征。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2022 Apr 20;35(2):e0022120. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00221-20. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Penile prosthesis salvage: a historical look at the Mulcahy technique and a review of the latest literature.阴茎假体挽救:对马尔卡希技术的历史回顾及最新文献综述。
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Mar;35(2):90-94. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00515-7. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
7
Penile implant infection part 3: the changing spectrum of treatment.阴茎植入物感染 第3部分:不断变化的治疗范围
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Sep;35(6):512-518. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-00382-8. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
8
Current Status for Semirigid Penile Prosthetic Devices.半刚性阴茎假体的现状。
Curr Urol Rep. 2021 Jan 9;22(2):7. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-01028-4.
9
Minimizing Penile Prosthesis Implant Infection: What Can We Learn From Orthopedic Surgery?最小化阴茎假体植入感染:我们可以从骨科手术中学到什么?
Urology. 2020 Dec;146:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.060. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
10
Penile implant infection prevention part II: device coatings have changed the game.阴茎植入物感染预防第二部分:器械涂层改变了游戏规则。
Int J Impot Res. 2020 Dec;33(8):801-807. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-0338-1. Epub 2020 Aug 7.