Leong Joon Yau, Capella Courtney E, D'Amico Maria J, Isguven Selin, Purtill Caroline, Machado Priscilla, Delaney Lauren J, Henry Gerard D, Hickok Noreen J, Forsberg Flemming, Chung Paul H
Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Transl Androl Urol. 2022 Aug;11(8):1210-1221. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-195.
Penile prosthesis (PP) is a gold standard for treatment of erectile dysfunction given its reliability and efficacy. Infection remains the most feared complication of prosthetic surgery, which usually results in device removal, and places a significant economic burden on the healthcare system. While biofilms have shown to support the persistence of microorganisms, the degree by which this matrix is truly pathogenic remains unknown given its high prevalence even in asymptomatic patients. We aim to review and summarize the current literature pertaining to biofilm formation in the setting of PP surgeries in clinically infected and non-infected cases.
Searches were performed in the MEDLINE online database through PubMed using a combination of keywords "penile prosthetic" OR "penile prosthesis" OR "penile implant" AND "biofilm" OR "revision" OR "removal" OR "infection" OR "explant". Eleven articles met inclusion criteria. There were only three studies that explicitly listed the number of biofilms identified in their cohort, but we also included eight articles that mentioned swabbing and culturing of any bacterial biofilm during revision procedures for both clinically infected and non-infected implants.
Infected PP yielded a 11-100% rate of biofilm presence, while non-infected PP yielded a 3-70% rate of biofilm presence. Time to reoperation from initial PP placement were also largely variable, ranging from 2 weeks to over 2 years. Coagulase-negative staphylococcus (i.e., ) were the most commonly reported organisms among non-infected implants, however, newer studies have identified a change towards more virulent organisms.
Since the advent of PP surgery, diabetes control, revision washout protocols and antibiotic-impregnated devices have led to an overall decrease in biofilm formation and infectious complications. There is an overall paradigm shift in microbial profiles with more virulent organisms, such as , , Enterococcus species, and even fungal species beginning to replace the more common coagulase-negative staphylococcal species, especially in clinically infected implants. Additional studies are necessary to define the significance of bacterial presence in biofilms using impactful technologies such as next-generation sequencing. Currently, preliminary and experimental biofilm-control strategies are also underway to further address this clinical issue.
阴茎假体(PP)因其可靠性和有效性,是治疗勃起功能障碍的金标准。感染仍然是假体手术最令人担忧的并发症,通常会导致装置移除,并给医疗系统带来巨大经济负担。虽然生物膜已被证明有助于微生物的持续存在,但鉴于其在无症状患者中也普遍存在,这种基质真正致病的程度仍不清楚。我们旨在回顾和总结当前关于临床感染和未感染病例中PP手术时生物膜形成的文献。
通过PubMed在MEDLINE在线数据库中进行检索,使用关键词“阴茎假体”或“阴茎植入物”与“生物膜”或“翻修”或“移除”或“感染”或“取出物”的组合。11篇文章符合纳入标准。只有三项研究明确列出了其队列中鉴定出的生物膜数量,但我们也纳入了八篇文章,这些文章提到了在临床感染和未感染植入物的翻修过程中对任何细菌生物膜的擦拭和培养。
感染的PP生物膜存在率为11%-100%,而未感染的PP生物膜存在率为3%-70%。从最初放置PP到再次手术的时间也有很大差异,从2周到超过2年不等。凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(即……)是未感染植入物中最常报告的微生物,然而,新的研究已经发现有向更具毒性的微生物转变的趋势。
自PP手术出现以来,糖尿病控制、翻修冲洗方案和抗生素浸渍装置已导致生物膜形成和感染并发症总体减少。微生物谱发生了总体范式转变,更具毒性的微生物,如……、肠球菌属,甚至真菌开始取代更常见的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌,尤其是在临床感染的植入物中。需要更多研究使用如新一代测序等有影响力的技术来确定生物膜中细菌存在的意义。目前,初步和实验性的生物膜控制策略也在进行中,以进一步解决这一临床问题。