Eron Joseph, Yeni Patrick, Gathe Joseph, Estrada Vicente, DeJesus Edwin, Staszewski Schlomo, Lackey Philip, Katlama Christine, Young Benjamin, Yau Linda, Sutherland-Phillips Denise, Wannamaker Paul, Vavro Cindy, Patel Lisa, Yeo Jane, Shaefer Mark
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Lancet. 2006 Aug 5;368(9534):476-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69155-1.
Lopinavir-ritonavir is a preferred protease inhibitor co-formulation for initial HIV-1 treatment. Fosamprenavir-ritonavir has shown similar efficacy and safety to lopinavir-ritonavir when each is combined with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. We compared the two treatments directly in antiretroviral-naive patients.
This open-label, non-inferiority study included 878 antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected patients randomised to receive either fosamprenavir-ritonavir 700 mg/100 mg twice daily or lopinavir-ritonavir 400 mg/100 mg twice daily, each with the co-formulation of abacavir-lamivudine 600 mg/300 mg once daily. Primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL at week 48 and treatment discontinuations because of an adverse event. The intent-to-treat analysis included all patients exposed to at least one dose of randomised study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00085943.
At week 48, non-inferiority of fosamprenavir-ritonavir to lopinavir-ritonavir (95% CI around the treatment difference -4.84 to 7.05) was shown, with 315 of 434 (73%) patients in the fosamprenavir-ritonavir group and 317 of 444 (71%) in the lopinavir-ritonavir group achieving HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL. Treatment discontinuations due to an adverse event were few and occurred with similar frequency in the two treatment groups (fosamprenavir-ritonavir 53, 12%; lopinavir-ritonavir 43, 10%). Diarrhoea, nausea, and abacavir hypersensitivity were the most frequent drug-related grade 2-4 adverse events. Treatment-emergent drug resistance was rare; no patient had virus that developed reduced susceptibility to fosamprenavir-ritonavir or lopinavir-ritonavir.
Fosamprenavir-ritonavir twice daily in treatment-naive patients provides similar antiviral efficacy, safety, tolerability, and emergence of resistance as lopinavir-ritonavir, each in combination with abacavir-lamivudine.
洛匹那韦-利托那韦是初始HIV-1治疗中首选的蛋白酶抑制剂复方制剂。福沙那韦-利托那韦与两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂联用时,已显示出与洛匹那韦-利托那韦相似的疗效和安全性。我们在未接受过抗逆转录病毒治疗的患者中直接比较了这两种治疗方法。
这项开放标签、非劣效性研究纳入了878例未接受过抗逆转录病毒治疗、HIV-1感染的患者,随机分为两组,一组接受福沙那韦-利托那韦700毫克/100毫克,每日两次,另一组接受洛匹那韦-利托那韦400毫克/100毫克,每日两次,两组均联合阿巴卡韦-拉米夫定复方制剂600毫克/300毫克,每日一次。主要终点为在第48周时HIV-1 RNA低于每毫升400拷贝的患者比例以及因不良事件导致的治疗中断情况。意向性分析纳入了所有至少接受过一剂随机研究药物的患者。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT00085943。
在第48周时,显示福沙那韦-利托那韦不劣于洛匹那韦-利托那韦(治疗差异的95%置信区间为-4.84至7.05),福沙那韦-利托那韦组434例患者中有315例(73%)、洛匹那韦-利托那韦组444例患者中有317例(71%)实现了HIV-1 RNA低于每毫升400拷贝。因不良事件导致的治疗中断很少,且在两个治疗组中发生频率相似(福沙那韦-利托那韦组53例,12%;洛匹那韦-利托那韦组43例,10%)。腹泻、恶心和阿巴卡韦超敏反应是最常见的2-4级药物相关不良事件。治疗中出现的耐药情况罕见;没有患者的病毒对福沙那韦-利托那韦或洛匹那韦-利托那韦产生敏感性降低。
对于未接受过治疗的患者,每日两次服用福沙那韦-利托那韦与每日两次服用洛匹那韦-利托那韦联合阿巴卡韦-拉米夫定相比,在抗病毒疗效、安全性、耐受性和耐药性出现方面相似。