Hogan Christopher J, Ruland Robert T
Bone and Joint/Sports Medicine Institute, Charette Health Sciences Center, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA.
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Jul;20(7):503-11. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200608000-00010.
The purpose of this review was to identify the relative impact of injected material, location of injury, time to debridement, injection pressure, infection, and the use of adjuvant steroid medication upon the need for amputation after high-pressure injection injuries to the upper extremity.
A Medline literature search extending from 1966 to December 2003 was performed, referencing the key words "high-pressure injection injury," "grease gun injury," "paint gun injury," "pressure gun injury," and "high-pressure injection." The results were limited to the English language and to reports involving human subjects. Each abstract was reviewed to confirm that the described injury had occurred in the upper extremity and that it had truly been a high-pressure injection. The reference pages from each of the papers were reviewed to identify additional reports of high-pressure injection injury. Manuscripts describing injuries resulting from hand held syringes or other low-pressure mechanisms were excluded.
All of the manuscripts were analyzed to identify the clinical outcome, age, hand dominance, site of injection, substance injected, injection pressure, elapsed time to wide debridement, use of steroids, and incidence of infection. These variables were subjected to a Pearson chi test to determine their impact upon the need for amputation.
Four hundred thirty-five cases of high-pressure injection injury to the upper extremity were identified. The amputation rate after these injuries was 30%. The location of the injury and the material injected contributed significantly to the need for amputation. For injections of paint, paint thinner, gasoline, oil, or jet fuel (organic solvents), the amputation risk was lower if wide surgical debridement occurred within 6 hours of injury. Steroids did not impact the amputation rate or incidence of infection. The presence of infection did not affect the incidence of amputation.
The risk of amputation after high-pressure injection injury to the upper extremity is highest with organic solvent injection into the fingers. Injections into the thumb or palm result in a much lower frequency of tissue loss. Emergent surgical debridement reduces the amputation risk after injections of organic solvents. From the available data, no conclusions could be reached regarding functional outcomes, other than amputation, after high-pressure injection injury.
本综述的目的是确定注射物质、损伤部位、清创时间、注射压力、感染以及辅助性类固醇药物的使用对上肢高压注射伤后截肢需求的相对影响。
进行了一项从1966年至2003年12月的Medline文献检索,参考关键词“高压注射伤”“油脂枪伤”“喷漆枪伤”“压力枪伤”和“高压注射”。结果仅限于英文文献以及涉及人类受试者的报告。对每篇摘要进行审查,以确认所描述的损伤发生在上肢且确实是高压注射伤。审查每篇论文的参考文献页,以识别高压注射伤的其他报告。排除描述手持注射器或其他低压机制导致损伤的手稿。
分析所有手稿,以确定临床结果、年龄、利手、注射部位、注射物质、注射压力、广泛清创的 elapsed 时间、类固醇的使用以及感染发生率。对这些变量进行Pearson卡方检验,以确定它们对截肢需求的影响。
确定了435例上肢高压注射伤病例。这些损伤后的截肢率为30%。损伤部位和注射物质对截肢需求有显著影响。对于注射油漆、油漆稀释剂、汽油、油或喷气燃料(有机溶剂)的情况,如果在受伤后6小时内进行广泛的手术清创,截肢风险较低。类固醇对截肢率或感染发生率没有影响。感染的存在并不影响截肢发生率。
上肢高压注射伤后,手指注射有机溶剂时截肢风险最高。注射到拇指或手掌导致组织丢失的频率要低得多。紧急手术清创可降低有机溶剂注射后的截肢风险。根据现有数据,除截肢外,关于高压注射伤后的功能结果无法得出结论。