Murakami Hideki, Yamazaki Ken, Attallah-Wasif Emad S, Tsai Kai-Jow, Shimamura Tadashi, Hutton William C
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, Japan.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Aug;19(6):442-6. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200608000-00012.
A biomechanical study was carried out on 3 different types of sublaminar wire used in constructs to secure the thoracic spine: stainless steel monofilament wire (steel wire), titanium cable (cable), and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tape (tape). Two experiments were carried out. Experiment 1: Thirty-one fresh human thoracic vertebrae classified as osteoporotic (bone mineral density of <0.8 g/cm2) were used. The steel wire, cable, or tape was placed sublaminarly and a tensile force was applied until the steel wire, cable, or tape cut 5 mm through the lamina, and the force at this point was noted. Experiment 2: Seven fresh human thoracic spines (T7-T10) were biomechanically tested as follows: axial compression (250 N), flexion (7.5 Nm), extension (7.5 Nm), left lateral bending (7.5 Nm), right lateral bending (7.5 Nm), left axial torsion (10 Nm), and right axial torsion (10 Nm). This sequence was applied to the intact spine. The spine was then de-stabilized and then restabilized using one or other of the 3 different types of sublaminar wires. The biomechanical testing was then repeated on the restabilized spine and stiffness curves were generated. In the laminar cut-through test, the cut-through force for tape was higher than that for either steel wire or cable. In the biomechanical stiffness testing, there was no significant difference between the 3 different sublaminar wiring constructs in any of the loading modes tested. The results of both experiments suggest that tape is as good, if not better, than steel wire or cable as a sublaminar wiring construct material.
对用于固定胸椎结构的3种不同类型的椎板下钢丝进行了生物力学研究:不锈钢单丝钢丝(钢丝)、钛缆(缆)和超高分子量聚乙烯带(带)。进行了两项实验。实验1:使用31个分类为骨质疏松(骨矿物质密度<0.8g/cm²)的新鲜人胸椎。将钢丝、缆或带置于椎板下,并施加拉力,直到钢丝、缆或带在椎板上切穿5mm,记录此时的力。实验2:对7个新鲜人胸椎(T7-T10)进行如下生物力学测试:轴向压缩(250N)、前屈(7.5Nm)、后伸(7.5Nm)、左侧弯(7.5Nm)、右侧弯(7.5Nm)、左侧轴向扭转(10Nm)和右侧轴向扭转(10Nm)。该序列应用于完整脊柱。然后使脊柱失稳,再使用3种不同类型的椎板下钢丝中的一种或另一种使其重新稳定。然后对重新稳定的脊柱重复进行生物力学测试并生成刚度曲线。在椎板切穿试验中,带的切穿力高于钢丝或缆。在生物力学刚度测试中,在任何测试的加载模式下,3种不同的椎板下钢丝结构之间均无显著差异。两项实验的结果均表明,作为椎板下钢丝结构材料,带即使不比钢丝或缆更好,也与它们一样好。