• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种不同策略实施草药及其他膳食补充剂在线课程的长期影响。

Long-term impact of four different strategies for delivering an on-line curriculum about herbs and other dietary supplements.

作者信息

Beal Tiffany, Kemper Kathi J, Gardiner Paula, Woods Charles

机构信息

Physican Assistant Program, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2006 Aug 7;6:39. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-39.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-6-39
PMID:16893458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1557850/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown that internet education can lead to short-term improvements in clinicians' knowledge, confidence and communication practices. We wished to better understand the duration of these improvements and whether different curriculum delivery strategies differed in affecting these improvements.

METHODS

As previously described, we conducted a randomized control trial comparing four different strategies for delivering an e-curriculum about herbs and other dietary supplements (HDS) to clinicians. The four strategies were delivering the curriculum by: a) email over 10 weeks; b) email within one week; c) web-site over 10 weeks; d) web-site within one week. Participants were surveyed at baseline, immediately after the course and 6-10 months after completing the course (long-term). Long-term outcomes focused on clinicians' knowledge, confidence and communication practices.

RESULTS

Of the 780 clinicians who completed the course, 385 (49%) completed the long-term survey. Completers and non-completers of the long-term survey had similar demographics and professional characteristics at baseline. There were statistically significant improvements from baseline to long-term follow-up in knowledge, confidence and communication practices; these improvements did not differ by curriculum delivery strategy. Knowledge scores improved from 67.7 +/- 10.3 at baseline to 78.8 +/- 12.3 at long-term follow-up (P < 0.001). Confidence scores improved from 53.7 +/- 17.8 at baseline to 66.9 +/- 12.0 at long term follow-up (P < 0.001); communication scores improved from 2.6 +/- 1.9 at baseline to 3.6 +/- 2.1 (P < 0.001) at long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This e- curriculum led to significant and sustained improvements in clinicians' expertise about HDS regardless of the delivery strategy. Future studies should compare the impact of required vs. elective courses and self-reported vs. objective measures of behavior change.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,网络教育可使临床医生的知识、信心和沟通实践在短期内得到改善。我们希望更好地了解这些改善的持续时间,以及不同的课程传授策略在影响这些改善方面是否存在差异。

方法

如前所述,我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较了向临床医生传授关于草药和其他膳食补充剂(HDS)的电子课程的四种不同策略。这四种策略分别是:a)在10周内通过电子邮件发送课程;b)在一周内通过电子邮件发送课程;c)在10周内通过网站提供课程;d)在一周内通过网站提供课程。在基线、课程结束后立即以及完成课程6至10个月后(长期)对参与者进行调查。长期结果聚焦于临床医生的知识、信心和沟通实践。

结果

在完成课程的780名临床医生中,385名(49%)完成了长期调查。长期调查的完成者和未完成者在基线时的人口统计学和专业特征相似。从基线到长期随访,知识、信心和沟通实践均有统计学上的显著改善;这些改善在课程传授策略方面没有差异。知识得分从基线时的67.7±10.3提高到长期随访时的78.8±12.3(P<0.001)。信心得分从基线时的53.7±17.8提高到长期随访时的66.9±12.0(P<0.001);沟通得分从基线时的2.6±1.9提高到长期随访时的3.6±2.1(P<0.001)。

结论

无论采用何种传授策略,该电子课程都能使临床医生在HDS方面的专业知识得到显著且持续的改善。未来的研究应比较必修课程与选修课程的影响,以及自我报告与行为改变的客观测量方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0304/1557850/8a6aa6c351d1/1472-6920-6-39-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0304/1557850/cb99d8d8b047/1472-6920-6-39-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0304/1557850/5375b3e21ffc/1472-6920-6-39-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0304/1557850/8a6aa6c351d1/1472-6920-6-39-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0304/1557850/cb99d8d8b047/1472-6920-6-39-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0304/1557850/5375b3e21ffc/1472-6920-6-39-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0304/1557850/8a6aa6c351d1/1472-6920-6-39-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term impact of four different strategies for delivering an on-line curriculum about herbs and other dietary supplements.四种不同策略实施草药及其他膳食补充剂在线课程的长期影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Aug 7;6:39. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-39.
2
Randomized controlled trial comparing four strategies for delivering e-curriculum to health care professionals [ISRCTN88148532].比较向医疗保健专业人员提供电子课程的四种策略的随机对照试验[ISRCTN88148532]
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Jan 11;6:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-2.
3
Changes in use of herbs and dietary supplements (HDS) among clinicians enrolled in an online curriculum.参加在线课程的临床医生使用草药和膳食补充剂(HDS)的情况变化。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007 Jun 12;7:21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-7-21.
4
Randomized trial of an internet curriculum on herbs and other dietary supplements for health care professionals.针对医疗保健专业人员的草药及其他膳食补充剂网络课程随机试验。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):882-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00014.
5
Online Education for Improving Communication and Documentation of Dietary Supplements Among Health Professionals Practicing in a Hospital Setting.针对在医院环境中执业的卫生专业人员开展的关于改善膳食补充剂沟通与记录的在线教育。
J Altern Complement Med. 2015 Oct;21(10):638-44. doi: 10.1089/acm.2015.0156. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
6
Dietary supplement use among health care professionals enrolled in an online curriculum on herbs and dietary supplements.参与草药和膳食补充剂在线课程的医疗保健专业人员的膳食补充剂使用情况。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006 Jun 12;6:21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-6-21.
7
Can interactive skills-based seminars with standardized patients enhance clinicians' prevention skills? Measuring the impact of a CME program.互动式基于技能的标准化患者研讨会能否提高临床医生的预防技能?评估一项 CME 项目的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):248-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.11.015. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
8
Herbal medicine course within pharmacy curriculum.药学课程体系中的草药医学课程。
J Herb Pharmacother. 2004;4(2):47-58.
9
California dental hygienists' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding herbal and dietary supplements.加利福尼亚州牙科保健员关于草药和膳食补充剂的知识、态度及实践。
J Dent Hyg. 2011 Fall;85(4):285-96. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
10
Clinic teaching made easy: a prospective study of the American Academy of Dermatology core curriculum in primary care learners.轻松掌握皮肤科临床教学:初级保健学习者中美国皮肤病学会核心课程的前瞻性研究。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Aug;69(2):273-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.12.955. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the Integrative Oncology Scholars Program on Oncology Providers' Key Knowledge of Dietary Supplements and Antioxidants for Providing Evidence-based Oncology Care.整体肿瘤学者计划对肿瘤学提供者提供循证肿瘤学护理的关键知识,包括膳食补充剂和抗氧化剂的影响。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Dec;38(6):1871-1878. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02348-y. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
2
Communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: evaluation study on self-perceived competences and views of health care professionals.COVID-19 大流行期间的沟通:医疗保健专业人员自我感知能力和观点的评估研究。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2021 Dec;12(6):1181-1190. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00532-1. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Expertise about herbs and dietary supplements among diverse health professionals.不同健康专业人员对草药和膳食补充剂的专业知识。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006 Apr 28;6:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-6-15.
2
Randomized controlled trial comparing four strategies for delivering e-curriculum to health care professionals [ISRCTN88148532].比较向医疗保健专业人员提供电子课程的四种策略的随机对照试验[ISRCTN88148532]
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Jan 11;6:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-2.
3
Comparison of the instructional efficacy of Internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops: a randomized controlled trial.
A Novel Curriculum on Using Life Expectancy to Inform Cancer Screening in Older Adults.
一种利用预期寿命告知老年人进行癌症筛查的新型课程。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Feb;69(2):524-529. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17016. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
The coordination of plural logics of action and its consequences: Evidence from plural medical systems.多种行动逻辑及其后果的协调:来自多种医学体系的证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 18;12(12):e0189841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189841. eCollection 2017.
5
Online Training in Mind-Body Therapies: Different Doses, Long-term Outcomes.身心疗法的在线培训:不同剂量与长期效果
J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2017 Oct;22(4):696-702. doi: 10.1177/2156587217701857. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
6
Online Education for Improving Communication and Documentation of Dietary Supplements Among Health Professionals Practicing in a Hospital Setting.针对在医院环境中执业的卫生专业人员开展的关于改善膳食补充剂沟通与记录的在线教育。
J Altern Complement Med. 2015 Oct;21(10):638-44. doi: 10.1089/acm.2015.0156. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
7
Family medicine residency program directors attitudes and knowledge of family medicine CAM competencies.家庭医学住院医师项目主任对家庭医学补充替代医学能力的态度和知识。
Explore (NY). 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2013.06.002.
8
Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update).跨专业教育:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响(更新版)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD002213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub3.
9
Herbal Medicine in Primary Healthcare in Germany: The Patient's Perspective.德国初级医疗保健中的草药医学:患者视角。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:294638. doi: 10.1155/2012/294638. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
10
A comparative evaluation of the effect of Internet-based CME delivery format on satisfaction, knowledge and confidence.基于互联网的继续医学教育(CME)交付模式对满意度、知识和信心影响的比较评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Jan 29;10:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-10.
基于互联网的继续医学教育与现场互动式继续医学教育工作坊的教学效果比较:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2005 Sep 7;294(9):1043-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.9.1043.
4
Health professionals rarely record history of complementary and alternative medicines.医疗专业人员很少记录补充和替代医学的使用史。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Feb;59(2):254-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02328.x.
5
Herb-drug interactions: an overview of the clinical evidence.草药-药物相互作用:临床证据概述
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Feb;19(1):1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2004.00301.x.
6
Disregarded use of herbal medical products and dietary supplements among surgical and medical patients as estimated by home inspection and interview.通过家庭检查和访谈估计手术及内科患者中草药产品和膳食补充剂的不当使用情况。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Sep;14(9):639-45. doi: 10.1002/pds.1049.
7
Herbs and other dietary supplements: healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and practices.草药及其他膳食补充剂:医疗保健专业人员的知识、态度及实践
Altern Ther Health Med. 2003 May-Jun;9(3):42-9.
8
Attitudes toward CAM among medical, nursing, and pharmacy faculty and students: a comparative analysis.医学、护理和药学专业教师及学生对补充替代医学的态度:一项比较分析。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2002 Nov-Dec;8(6):44-7, 50-3.
9
CME reform: an imperative for improving the quality of medical care.继续医学教育改革:提高医疗质量的当务之急。
Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10):943-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200210000-00001.
10
Randomized trial of an internet curriculum on herbs and other dietary supplements for health care professionals.针对医疗保健专业人员的草药及其他膳食补充剂网络课程随机试验。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):882-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00014.