Suppr超能文献

心脏骤停的三相模型:旁观者心肺复苏的时间依赖性益处

Three-phase model of cardiac arrest: time-dependent benefit of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

作者信息

Gilmore Christina M, Rea Thomas D, Becker Linda J, Eisenberg Mickey S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2006 Aug 15;98(4):497-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.02.055. Epub 2006 Jun 19.

Abstract

Evidence has suggested that the pathophysiology of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest may consist of 3 time-sensitive phases: electrical, circulatory, and metabolic. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults in a metropolitan county who had had witnessed ventricular fibrillation arrest before emergency medical services were undertaken to investigate this 3-phase model with regard to bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We hypothesized that the survival benefit from bystander CPR depends on the collapse-to-shock interval, with the highest benefit occurring during the circulatory phase. The collapse-to-shock interval was a priori grouped into 4 categories: 1 to 5, 6 to 7, 8 to 10, and > or = 11 minutes. We used logistic regression analysis to assess whether the association between CPR and survival to hospital discharge depended on the collapse-to-shock interval category. Of the 2,193 events meeting the inclusion criteria, 67.0% had received bystander CPR. The average collapse-to-shock interval was 8.2 +/- 2.8 minutes. The survival rate was 33.4%. A higher likelihood of survival was associated with bystander CPR (odds ratio [OR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15 to 1.73) and a shorter collapse-to-shock interval (OR -1.84, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.10, for each additional SD of 2.8 minutes less) after adjustment. The beneficial association of CPR increased as the collapse-to-shock interval increased (p = 0.05 for interaction). The bystander CPR was associated with an OR of survival of 0.96 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.46) for a 1- to 5-minute collapse-to shock interval, OR of 1.25 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.58) for a 6- to 7-minute interval, OR of 1.62 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.11) for an 8- to 10-minute interval, and OR of 2.11 (95% CI 1.32 to 3.37) for an > or = 11-minute interval. The results of this investigation support a phased model of ventricular fibrillation arrest. The findings suggest that the transition from the electrical to circulatory phase may occur at about 5 minutes, and the circulatory phase may extend to 15 minutes.

摘要

有证据表明,心室颤动心脏骤停的病理生理学可能包括3个时间敏感阶段:电活动阶段、循环阶段和代谢阶段。我们对一个大城市县内成年人心室颤动心脏骤停且在紧急医疗服务启动前被目击的情况进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以调查旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)方面的这一三相模型。我们假设旁观者心肺复苏带来的生存获益取决于心脏骤停至电击的时间间隔,在循环阶段获益最大。心脏骤停至电击的时间间隔被预先分为4类:1至5分钟、6至7分钟、8至10分钟以及≥11分钟。我们使用逻辑回归分析来评估心肺复苏与出院存活之间的关联是否取决于心脏骤停至电击的时间间隔类别。在符合纳入标准的2193例事件中,67.0%接受了旁观者心肺复苏。心脏骤停至电击的平均时间间隔为8.2±2.8分钟。存活率为33.4%。调整后,较高的存活可能性与旁观者心肺复苏(优势比[OR]1.41,95%置信区间[CI]1.15至1.73)以及较短的心脏骤停至电击时间间隔(每少2.8分钟的标准差,OR为-1.84,95%CI为1.62至2.10)相关。随着心脏骤停至电击时间间隔的增加,心肺复苏的有益关联增强(交互作用p = 0.05)。对于1至5分钟的心脏骤停至电击时间间隔,旁观者心肺复苏与存活的OR为0.96(95%CI为0.64至1.46),对于6至7分钟的时间间隔,OR为1.25(95%CI为1.00至1.58),对于8至10分钟的时间间隔,OR为1.62(95%CI为1.25至2.11),对于≥11分钟的时间间隔,OR为2.11(95%CI为1.3至3.37)。这项调查结果支持心室颤动心脏骤停的阶段模型。研究结果表明,从电活动阶段到循环阶段的转变可能发生在大约五分钟时,且循环阶段可能会持续到15分钟。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验