• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估挥鞭伤恢复情况——挥鞭伤残疾问卷

Assessing whiplash recovery--the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire.

作者信息

Ferrari Robert, Russell Anthony, Kelly Allan J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Aust Fam Physician. 2006 Aug;35(8):653-4.

PMID:16894446
Abstract

BACKGROUND

General practitioners often need to track outcomes of whiplash patients, and a disability questionnaire may be useful.

METHODS

Whiplash patients who attended primary care clinics in Edmonton, Canada were interviewed 3 months postcollision. Subjects were asked a global recovery question: "Do you feel you have recovered fully from your accident injuries?" Subjects then completed the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire (WDQ).

RESULTS

A total of 131 subjects participated. Of these, 52 (39.7%) reported that they felt they had recovered. Those who reported complete recovery had a mean WDQ score of 2.5 and those who reported they had not recovered had a mean WDQ score of 29.9. All who responded "yes" to the recovery question had a WDQ score below 13, while all those responding "no" to the recovery question had a WDQ score of 13 or more.

DISCUSSION

The WDQ as an outcome measure may be useful in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

全科医生经常需要追踪挥鞭样损伤患者的治疗结果,一份残疾调查问卷可能会有所帮助。

方法

对在加拿大埃德蒙顿初级保健诊所就诊的挥鞭样损伤患者在碰撞后3个月进行访谈。向受试者询问一个总体恢复问题:“你觉得自己已经从事故损伤中完全康复了吗?”然后受试者完成挥鞭样损伤残疾调查问卷(WDQ)。

结果

共有131名受试者参与。其中,52人(39.7%)报告称他们觉得自己已经康复。报告完全康复的受试者的WDQ平均得分为2.5,而报告未康复的受试者的WDQ平均得分为29.9。对恢复问题回答“是”的所有受试者的WDQ得分均低于13,而对恢复问题回答“否”的所有受试者的WDQ得分均为13或更高。

讨论

WDQ作为一种结果测量方法在临床实践中可能会有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Assessing whiplash recovery--the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire.评估挥鞭伤恢复情况——挥鞭伤残疾问卷
Aust Fam Physician. 2006 Aug;35(8):653-4.
2
Evaluation of the core outcome measure in whiplash.挥鞭伤核心结局指标的评估
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 15;32(6):696-702. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000257595.75367.52.
3
Structural and construct validity of the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire in adults with acute whiplash-associated disorders.急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病成人患者中挥鞭样损伤残疾问卷的结构效度和构建效度
Spine J. 2015 Nov 1;15(11):2369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
4
A prospective cohort study of health outcomes following whiplash associated disorders in an Australian population.一项针对澳大利亚人群挥鞭样损伤相关疾病后健康结局的前瞻性队列研究。
Inj Prev. 2006 Apr;12(2):93-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.010421.
5
Acute stress response and recovery after whiplash injuries. A one-year prospective study.挥鞭样损伤后的急性应激反应与恢复:一项为期一年的前瞻性研究。
Eur J Pain. 2008 May;12(4):455-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
6
Simple educational intervention to improve the recovery from acute whiplash: results of a randomized, controlled trial.改善急性挥鞭样损伤恢复情况的简单教育干预措施:一项随机对照试验的结果
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Aug;12(8):699-706. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.03.531.
7
How well are you recovering? The association between a simple question about recovery and patient reports of pain intensity and pain disability in whiplash-associated disorders.你的恢复情况如何?关于恢复的简单问题与挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者报告的疼痛强度和疼痛残疾之间的关系。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(1):45-52. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.587085. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
8
Spanish Version of the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire in Adults With Acute Whiplash-Associated Disorders.成人急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者的鞭打伤残疾问卷西班牙语版本。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 May;42(4):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.013.
9
German translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the whiplash disability questionnaire.德文翻译、文化调适及颈鞭伤伤残问卷验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Mar 14;11:45. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-45.
10
Association between body mass index and recovery from whiplash injuries: a cohort study.体重指数与挥鞭伤恢复之间的关联:一项队列研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 May 1;165(9):1063-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk110. Epub 2007 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
An analysis of whiplash injury outcomes in an Irish population: a retrospective fifteen-year study of a spine surgeon's experience.爱尔兰人群中挥鞭样损伤结局的分析:一位脊柱外科医生十五年经验的回顾性研究。
Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Feb;189(1):211-217. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02035-2. Epub 2019 May 22.
2
Reliability and validity of self-reported questionnaires to measure pain and disability in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: part 3-a systematic review from the CADRE Collaboration.自评问卷测量颈痛及其相关疾病成人疼痛和残疾的可靠性和有效性:第 3 部分-CADRE 协作的系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2019 May;28(5):1156-1179. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05949-8. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
3
Is a government-regulated rehabilitation guideline more effective than general practitioner education or preferred-provider rehabilitation in promoting recovery from acute whiplash-associated disorders? A pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
政府监管的康复指南在促进急性与挥鞭样损伤相关的疾病的恢复方面是否比全科医生教育或首选提供者康复更有效?一项实用随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):e021283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021283.
4
Practice-audit-publish: A practice reflection.实践-审核-发表:一次实践反思。
Eur J Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;3(4):175-178. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2015.1537. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
5
A prospective study of the 1-year incidence of fibromyalgia after acute whiplash injury.一项前瞻性研究显示,急性颈鞭伤 1 年后纤维肌痛的发病率。
RMD Open. 2015 Feb 18;1(1):e000007. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2014-000007. eCollection 2015.
6
Effect of a pain diary use on recovery from acute low back (lumbar) sprain.使用疼痛日记对急性下背部(腰部)扭伤恢复的影响。
Rheumatol Int. 2015 Jan;35(1):55-9. doi: 10.1007/s00296-014-3082-3. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
7
A prospective study of perceived injustice in whiplash victims and its relationship to recovery.一项关于鞭打损伤受害者感知到的不公正及其与康复关系的前瞻性研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2015 May;34(5):975-9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2693-0. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
8
Effect of a pain diary use on recovery from acute whiplash injury: a cohort study.使用疼痛日记对急性挥鞭样损伤恢复的影响:一项队列研究。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013 Nov;14(11):1049-53. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1300022.
9
Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review.颈部疼痛患者专用问卷的测量特性:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2012 May;21(4):659-70. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9965-9. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
10
Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of physician education and activation versus two rehabilitation programs for the treatment of Whiplash-associated Disorders: The University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial.一项关于医生教育与激励措施对比两种康复方案治疗挥鞭样损伤相关疾病有效性的随机对照试验方案:大学健康网络挥鞭样损伤干预试验
Trials. 2008 Dec 24;9:75. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-75.