Rebbeck Trudy J, Refshauge Kathryn M, Maher Christopher G, Stewart Mark
Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 15;32(6):696-702. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000257595.75367.52.
Reanalysis of data derived from longitudinal cohort studies.
To comprehensively evaluate the psychometric properties of a 5-item version of the Core Outcome Measure in people with whiplash.
The 7-item Core Outcome Measure was initially proposed as a brief health outcome measure for use in low back pain. To date, this measure has not been comprehensively assessed in a whiplash population. METHOD.: Data were sourced from 3 separate whiplash cohorts (total 481) encompassing acute, early chronic, and late-chronic whiplash among primary care and insurance populations. Subjects completed a 5-item version of the Core Outcome Measure for whiplash (Core Whiplash Outcome Measure [CWOM]), the Functional Rating Index, Neck Disability Index, SF-36, and perceived recovery questionnaires at baseline and short and long-term follow-up periods. Psychometric evaluation of the CWOM included assessing questionnaire responses, internal consistency, construct validity, and internal and external responsiveness.
Internal consistency was excellent at all stages of whiplash (Cronbach alpha = 0.76 in the acute stage and 0.83 in the late-chronic stage). Convergent validity was observed between the CWOM and Functional Rating Index (Pearson r = 0.81), Neck Disability Index (Pearson r = 0.76), and SF-36 physical health summary measure (Pearson r = -0.65). Divergent validity was observed between the CWOM and SF-36 mental health summary measure (Pearson r = -0.45). The internal and external responsiveness of the CWOM was similar to other neck-specific outcome measures.
We recommend the 5-item CWOM as a brief clinical measure for whiplash because it is quick to administer and score, and has excellent measurement properties. The CWOM may need to be supplemented with other questionnaires (e.g., when assessment of psychological or emotional health is required).
对纵向队列研究得出的数据进行重新分析。
全面评估用于挥鞭样损伤患者的5项核心结局指标的心理测量特性。
7项核心结局指标最初被提议作为用于腰痛的简短健康结局指标。迄今为止,该指标尚未在挥鞭样损伤人群中得到全面评估。方法:数据来源于3个独立的挥鞭样损伤队列(共481例),涵盖初级保健人群和保险人群中的急性、早期慢性和晚期慢性挥鞭样损伤。受试者在基线、短期和长期随访期完成了用于挥鞭样损伤的5项核心结局指标(核心挥鞭样损伤结局指标[CWOM])、功能评定指数、颈部功能障碍指数、SF-36以及感知恢复问卷。对CWOM的心理测量评估包括评估问卷回答、内部一致性、结构效度以及内部和外部反应性。
在挥鞭样损伤的所有阶段,内部一致性都非常好(急性期Cronbachα系数 = 0.76,晚期慢性期为0.83)。在CWOM与功能评定指数(Pearson相关系数r = 0.81)、颈部功能障碍指数(Pearson相关系数r = 0.76)以及SF-36身体健康总结指标(Pearson相关系数r = -0.65)之间观察到了收敛效度。在CWOM与SF-36心理健康总结指标之间观察到了区分效度(Pearson相关系数r = -0.45)。CWOM的内部和外部反应性与其他颈部特异性结局指标相似。
我们推荐5项CWOM作为用于挥鞭样损伤的简短临床指标,因为它易于实施和评分,并且具有出色的测量特性。当需要评估心理或情绪健康时,CWOM可能需要辅以其他问卷。