Krosin Michael T, Klitzman Robert, Levin Bruce, Cheng Jianfeng, Ranney Megan L
San Francisco Orthopedic Program at St. Mary's Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Clin Trials. 2006;3(3):306-13. doi: 10.1191/1740774506cn150oa.
Clinical trials undertaken by industrialized nations in undeveloped nations pose several critical ethical dilemmas. One key potential problem concerns misunderstandings of the consent process by participants. Though other reports have begun to explore this area, needs remain to identify specific areas of misunderstanding.
To identify deficits in comprehension during consent processes in Mali, West Africa.
After obtaining informed consent for participation for a malaria vaccine trial being conducted in two West African villages, we administered to participants a nine-item questionnaire testing their understanding of information relevant for their consent. After testing their ability to understand a multiple choice format, 78 of 100 subjects were administered the questionnaire in one village and 85 of 100 in the other.
Participants had difficulty comprehending several concepts relevant to informed consent: 90% of respondents did not understand withdrawal criterion, 93% did not understand the existence of study side effects, and 74% did not understand that they were enrolled in an investigation as opposed to receiving therapy. The response rate and percentage of correct answers was generally much higher in the village nearer an urban center than the more rural village. The percent of correct answers exceeded 50% for five questions in the urban village and for only two question in the more rural setting.
Potential limitations of this study are relating to translation, cultural differences in the notion of informed consent, staff differences between each village, the proportion who could not understand the survey instrument and the fact that the study explored participants' understanding of the consent process but did not observe the process itself.
This study illustrates potential areas of miscomprehension in the consent process in a developing country. The degree of miscomprehension found in this study appeared to be more than that found in similar studies conducted in industrialized nations. Despite efforts to obtain truly informed consent, several factors make it more challenging in the developing world. This research highlights the need for more comprehensive studies of consent in developing countries. Such studies may eventually aid investigators in identifying, targeting and addressing specific areas of miscomprehension and thereby improve the informed consent process in the developing world.
工业化国家在不发达国家开展的临床试验引发了若干关键的伦理困境。一个关键的潜在问题涉及参与者对同意过程的误解。尽管其他报告已开始探索这一领域,但仍需确定具体的误解领域。
确定西非马里同意过程中的理解缺陷。
在获得参与在两个西非村庄进行的疟疾疫苗试验的知情同意后,我们向参与者发放了一份包含九个项目的问卷,测试他们对与同意相关信息的理解。在测试他们理解多项选择题形式的能力后,一个村庄的100名受试者中有78名接受了问卷调查,另一个村庄的100名受试者中有85名接受了调查。
参与者在理解与知情同意相关的几个概念方面存在困难:90%的受访者不理解退出标准,93%的受访者不理解研究副作用的存在,74%的受访者不理解他们是参与一项调查而不是接受治疗。在靠近城市中心的村庄,回复率和正确答案的百分比通常比更偏远的村庄高得多。在城市村庄,五个问题的正确答案百分比超过50%,而在更偏远的村庄只有两个问题的正确答案百分比超过50%。
本研究的潜在局限性与翻译、知情同意概念中的文化差异、每个村庄的工作人员差异、无法理解调查问卷的比例以及该研究探索了参与者对同意过程的理解但未观察过程本身这一事实有关。
本研究说明了发展中国家同意过程中潜在的误解领域。本研究中发现的误解程度似乎高于在工业化国家进行的类似研究中发现的程度。尽管努力获得真正的知情同意,但几个因素使得在发展中世界更具挑战性。这项研究强调了对发展中国家同意问题进行更全面研究的必要性。此类研究最终可能有助于研究人员识别、针对和解决特定的误解领域,从而改善发展中世界的知情同意过程。