Dehlin Helena, Nilsson Marie-Charlotte, Wardle David A
Department of Forest Vegetation Ecology, Faculty of Forest Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 83, Umea, Sweden.
Oecologia. 2006 Nov;150(1):108-18. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0501-5. Epub 2006 Aug 3.
Leaf litter and other organic resources returned to the soil are important regulators of ecological processes in forest ecosystems, and their ecological impacts may be strongly influenced both by their quality and by interactions between coexisting resource types. To date, most studies on effects of resource identity and mixing have only involved leaf litter, despite the fact that other resource types constitute a major input to the soil. We investigated how quality and heterogeneity of organic substrates found in boreal forests affects the activity and community structure of soil microbes, and plant growth. Six organic substrates (wood, charcoal, berries, sporocarps, vertebrate faeces and leaf litter) were added singly or in mixtures of two, three and six resource types to pots containing forest soil (with or without tree seedlings of Betula pendula Roth). The largest positive effects of single substrates on microbial basal respiration (BR), substrate-induced respiration (SIR) and microbial metabolic quotient (qCO(2)) were found for nutrient-rich substrates (faeces and sporocarps) or substrates with high sugar-content (berries). Mixing of substrates had no effect on BR or SIR, but decreased qCO(2) or altered the microbial community structure for specific combinations of substrates. In contrast to the niche complementarity hypothesis, microbial catabolic diversity was not stimulated by greater diversity of resources. Seedling growth responses to single substrates were neutral or negative; the inhibition of growth probably resulted largely from microbial competition for nutrients. Substrate mixing enhanced seedling nutrient-uptake and growth for all mixtures containing sporocarps and leaf litter. Overall, plants responded more strongly to resource heterogeneity than microbes, and synergistic effects only occurred when nutrient-rich substrates were present within the substrate mixtures. In particular, our results demonstrate a role for complex and non-additive interactions among previously overlooked resource types returned to the soil in influencing ecosystem functions such as nutrient cycling and plant productivity.
落叶和其他归还到土壤中的有机资源是森林生态系统中生态过程的重要调节者,它们的生态影响可能会受到其质量以及共存资源类型之间相互作用的强烈影响。迄今为止,尽管其他资源类型是土壤的主要输入成分,但大多数关于资源特性和混合效应的研究仅涉及落叶。我们研究了北方森林中有机底物的质量和异质性如何影响土壤微生物的活性和群落结构以及植物生长。将六种有机底物(木材、木炭、浆果、子实体、脊椎动物粪便和落叶)单独添加,或以两种、三种和六种资源类型的混合物形式添加到装有森林土壤(有或没有欧洲白桦树苗)的花盆中。对于营养丰富的底物(粪便和子实体)或含糖量高的底物(浆果),发现单一底物对微生物基础呼吸(BR)、底物诱导呼吸(SIR)和微生物代谢商(qCO₂)具有最大的积极影响。底物混合对BR或SIR没有影响,但会降低qCO₂,或改变特定底物组合的微生物群落结构。与生态位互补假说相反,资源多样性增加并未刺激微生物分解代谢多样性。幼苗对单一底物的生长反应呈中性或负面;生长抑制可能主要是由于微生物对养分的竞争。底物混合增强了所有含有子实体和落叶的混合物中幼苗的养分吸收和生长。总体而言,植物对资源异质性的反应比对微生物的反应更强,并且只有当底物混合物中存在营养丰富的底物时才会出现协同效应。特别是,我们的结果表明,归还到土壤中的先前被忽视的资源类型之间复杂的非加性相互作用在影响养分循环和植物生产力等生态系统功能方面发挥了作用。