伴侣攻击风险研究：实验室情侣冲突方案对参与者的影响。
The risk of partner aggression research: impact of laboratory couples conflict protocols on participants.
作者信息
Owen Daniela J, Heyman Richard E, Slep Amy M Smith
机构信息
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 11794-2500, USA.
出版信息
Violence Vict. 2006 Aug;21(4):483-97.
Abstract
The impact of male-to-female intimate partner violence (IPV) research on participants is unknown. A measure of impact was given to participants in an IPV study to assess systematically the impact of completing questionnaires, engaging in conflict conversations, and being interviewed individually about anger escalation and de-escalation during the conversations. Participants completed a six-question, Likert-scaled impact measure. Both male and female participants rated the impact of the study as helpful to them personally and to their relationships. Female participants rated different segments of the study as more helpful to themselves and their relationships, while male participants did not find any segment of the study to have a different impact than other segments.
摘要
男性对女性亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）研究对参与者的影响尚不清楚。在一项IPV研究中，对参与者进行了一项影响评估，以系统地评估完成问卷、参与冲突对话以及在对话中就愤怒升级和缓和进行单独访谈的影响。参与者完成了一项六个问题的李克特量表影响评估。男性和女性参与者都认为该研究对他们个人及其关系有帮助。女性参与者认为研究的不同部分对她们自己及其关系更有帮助，而男性参与者并未发现研究的任何部分与其他部分有不同的影响。
相似文献
1
The risk of partner aggression research: impact of laboratory couples conflict protocols on participants.伴侣攻击风险研究：实验室情侣冲突方案对参与者的影响。
Violence Vict. 2006 Aug;21(4):483-97.
2
Intimate partner violence and preschoolers' explicit memory functioning.亲密伴侣暴力与学龄前儿童的显性记忆功能。
J Fam Psychol. 2008 Jun;22(3):420-428. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.420.
3
Females' reasons for their physical aggression in dating relationships.女性在恋爱关系中实施身体攻击行为的原因。
J Interpers Violence. 2007 Sep;22(9):1131-43. doi: 10.1177/0886260507303729.
4
The context of violent disagreements between parents: a qualitative analysis from parents' reports.父母之间激烈分歧的背景：基于父母报告的定性分析
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 24;14:1324. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1324.
5
Telephone survey respondents' reactions to questions regarding interpersonal violence.电话调查受访者对有关人际暴力问题的反应。
Violence Vict. 2006 Aug;21(4):445-59.
6
Men who batter intimate partners: a grounded theory study of the development of male violence in intimate partner relationships.殴打亲密伴侣的男性：对亲密伴侣关系中男性暴力行为发展的扎根理论研究。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2005 Apr;26(3):281-97. doi: 10.1080/01612840590915676.
7
Does questionnaire format impact reported partner violence rates?: An experimental study.问卷格式会影响所报告的伴侣暴力发生率吗？一项实验研究。
Violence Vict. 2006 Aug;21(4):507-18.
8
Testing a cycle of family violence model in conflict-affected, low-income countries: a qualitative study from Timor-Leste.在受冲突影响的低收入国家测试家庭暴力模式周期：来自东帝汶的一项定性研究
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;130:284-91. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
9
Turning points for perpetrators of intimate partner violence.亲密伴侣暴力加害者的转折点。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2012 Jan;13(1):30-40. doi: 10.1177/1524838011426016. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
10
Brief Report: Associations Between Self-Reported Paternal Relationships, Anger, Alcohol, and Intimate Partner Violence in a Prison Sample.简短报告：监狱样本中自我报告的父子关系、愤怒、酒精与亲密伴侣暴力之间的关联
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2017 Jul;61(9):1063-1070. doi: 10.1177/0306624X15609558. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
引用本文的文献
1
The Challenges of Conducting Qualitative Research on "couples" in Abusive Intimate Partner Relationships Involving Substance Use.对涉及物质使用的虐待性亲密伴侣关系中的“伴侣”进行定性研究的挑战。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Mar;31(4):767-777. doi: 10.1177/1049732320975722. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
2
Targeting couple and parent-child coercion to improve health behaviors.针对夫妻和亲子强制行为，改善健康行为。
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Feb;101:82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
3
Methods for Assessing and Addressing Participant Protection Concerns in Intimate Partner Violence Research.亲密伴侣暴力研究中评估和解决参与者保护问题的方法。
Partner Abuse. 2013 Oct 1;4(4):482-493. doi: 10.1891/1946-6560.4.4.482.
4
PTSD and conflict behavior between veterans and their intimate partners.创伤后应激障碍与退伍军人及其亲密伴侣之间的冲突行为。
J Anxiety Disord. 2013 Mar;27(2):240-51. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
本文引用的文献
1
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
2
Using random telephone sampling to recruit generalizable samples for family violence studies.使用随机电话抽样为家庭暴力研究招募具有广泛代表性的样本。
J Fam Psychol. 2006 Dec;20(4):680-9. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.4.680.
3
Alcohol consumption and intimate partner violence by alcoholic men: comparing violent and nonviolent conflicts.酗酒男性的酒精消费与亲密伴侣暴力行为：暴力冲突与非暴力冲突的比较
Psychol Addict Behav. 2005 Mar;19(1):35-42. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.19.1.35.
4
Psychology and the study of marital processes.心理学与婚姻过程研究
Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:169-97. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.169.
5
Participation in trauma research: is there evidence of harm?参与创伤研究：是否存在危害证据？
J Trauma Stress. 2003 Jun;16(3):221-7. doi: 10.1023/A:1023735821900.
6
Risks and wrongs in social science research. An evaluator's guide to the IRB.社会科学研究中的风险与错误。机构审查委员会评估指南。
Eval Rev. 2002 Oct;26(5):443-79. doi: 10.1177/019384102236520.
7
Startle reactivity and PTSD symptoms in a community sample of women.社区女性样本中的惊吓反应性与创伤后应激障碍症状
Psychiatry Res. 2001 Mar 25;101(2):157-69. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(01)00221-9.
8
Observation of couple conflicts: clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations.夫妻冲突观察：临床评估应用、顽固的真相与薄弱的基础
Psychol Assess. 2001 Mar;13(1):5-35. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.13.1.5.
9
Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence.身体和心理层面亲密伴侣暴力行为对身体健康的影响。
Arch Fam Med. 2000 May;9(5):451-7. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.5.451.
10
Rates of intimate partner violence in the United States.美国亲密伴侣暴力的发生率。
Am J Public Health. 1998 Nov;88(11):1702-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.11.1702.
Zotero 插件