Digesu G Alessandro, Chaliha Charlotte, Khullar Vik, Salvatore Stefano, Milani Rodolfo, Cacciapuoti Cinzia, Athanasiou Stavros
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Urogynaecology Unit, Bassini Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 May;18(5):493-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0181-z. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
This prospective study aims to evaluate the relationship between urethral resistance pressure (URP) and pressure flow parameters in women with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Consecutive women with LUTS attending three tertiary referral urodynamic clinics were asked to undergo urodynamic evaluation, pressure flow studies and URP measurement. The pressure flow parameters such as detrusor pressures at the start of flow (ODP), detrusor pressure at peak flow rate (PdetQmax), peak flow rate (Qmax) and detrusor pressure at the end of flow (CDP) were measured. The relationship between URP and pressure flow parameters was evaluated as well as differences between each urodynamic group. Two hundred seventy-nine women attended for urodynamic investigations. Two hundred twenty-three (79.9%) women had good quality pressure flow measurements and were included in the study. The mean age was 58 years (range 21-83). Women with urodynamic stress incontinence had significantly lower URP and ODP than those with detrusor over-activity [54.8 (+/-17.9) and 12.4 (+/-4.1) cmH(2)O, respectively, vs 85.6 (+/-21.4) and 33.7 (+/-13.3) cmH(2)O, respectively) (p<0.05, Bonferroni test). Furthermore, women with urodynamic stress incontinence have significantly lower PdetQmax values as well as higher Qmax than women with competent urethral sphincters (p<0.05, Bonferroni test). There was a significant correlation between ODP, PdetQmax, Qmax and URP measurements. In urodynamic stress incontinence, both URP and pressure flow parameters are reduced. Although the trend for values of both tests were similar and there was a significant correlation between these tests, we should consider that urethral function at rest differ from that during voiding due to activation of additional mechanisms. Therefore, further study is needed to confirm our results.
这项前瞻性研究旨在评估下尿路症状(LUTS)女性的尿道阻力压力(URP)与压力流参数之间的关系。连续就诊于三家三级转诊尿动力学诊所的LUTS女性被要求接受尿动力学评估、压力流研究和URP测量。测量了诸如排尿开始时的逼尿肌压力(ODP)、最大尿流率时的逼尿肌压力(PdetQmax)、最大尿流率(Qmax)以及排尿结束时的逼尿肌压力(CDP)等压力流参数。评估了URP与压力流参数之间的关系以及各尿动力学组之间的差异。279名女性接受了尿动力学检查。223名(79.9%)女性获得了质量良好的压力流测量结果并被纳入研究。平均年龄为58岁(范围21 - 83岁)。尿动力学压力性尿失禁女性的URP和ODP显著低于逼尿肌过度活动女性[分别为54.8(±17.9)和12.4(±4.1)cmH₂O,相比之下分别为85.6(±21.4)和33.7(±13.3)cmH₂O](p<0.05,Bonferroni检验)。此外,尿动力学压力性尿失禁女性的PdetQmax值显著低于尿道括约肌功能正常的女性,而Qmax则更高(p<0.05,Bonferroni检验)。ODP、PdetQmax、Qmax与URP测量值之间存在显著相关性。在尿动力学压力性尿失禁中,URP和压力流参数均降低。尽管两项测试值的趋势相似且这些测试之间存在显著相关性,但由于额外机制的激活,我们应考虑静息时的尿道功能与排尿时不同。因此,需要进一步研究来证实我们的结果。