Denson Thomas F, Earleywine Mitch
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, SGM 501, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006 Aug 10;1:22. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-1-22.
Taxometric methods were used to discern the latent structure of cannabis dependence. Such methods help determine if a construct is categorical or dimensional. Taxometric analyses (MAXEIG and MAMBAC) were conducted on data from 1,474 cannabis-using respondents to the 2001-2002 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Respondents answered questions assessing DSM-IV criteria for cannabis dependence.
Both taxometric methods provided support for a dimensional structure of cannabis dependence.
Although the MAMBAC results were not entirely unequivocal, the majority of evidence favored a dimensional structure of cannabis dependence.
采用分类分析方法来识别大麻依赖的潜在结构。此类方法有助于确定一个构念是类别型还是维度型。对参加2001 - 2002年全国酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查(NESARC)的1474名使用大麻的受访者的数据进行了分类分析(最大特征值法和MAMBAC法)。受访者回答了评估大麻依赖的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM - IV)标准的问题。
两种分类分析方法均支持大麻依赖的维度结构。
尽管MAMBAC法的结果并非完全明确,但大多数证据支持大麻依赖的维度结构。