Green Anna Louise, Williams Allison
Western Hospital, Gordon Street, Footscray, 3011, Vic., Australia.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2006 Oct;22(5):274-82. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 Aug 9.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the introduction of a clinical marker tool using a pre- and post-test design in a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. The clinical marker tool was designed to assist in the early identification of unstable patients in the general surgical and medical ward environment based on abnormal vital signs.
A pre- and post-test design of the clinical marker tool was undertaken over a 3-year period. All unstable ward patients who were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) from 1 February 2002 to 31 January 2003 (pre- implementation period) and from 1 February 2003 to 31 January 2005 (post-implementation period) were included in the study. A secondary analysis was performed on annual medical emergency calls made to the resuscitation team and mortality from such events from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004.
Prior to implementing the clinical marker tool, 63 (41.2%) unplanned ICU admissions from the ward had clinical markers present for > or =6h. Following implementation of the clinical marker tool, 101 (24.5%) patients had clinical markers present for > or =6h (p=0.0002). There was no difference in ICU or hospital length of stay or hospital mortality for unplanned admissions to the ICU following implementation of the clinical marker tool. The number of patients found to be still breathing with a pulse on arrival of the resuscitation team was significantly increased from 56 (47.9%) patients to 181 (64.6%) patients post-implementation of the clinical marker tool (p=0.0024). Additionally, we found an associated increase in survival of this group of patients discharged home from 33 (59%) patients to 136 (75.1%) patients post-implementation of the clinical marker tool (p=0.0003).
The clinical marker tool implemented by an ICU Liaison Team improved the management of patients in the ward environment, including proactive admission of patients to the ICU. Additionally, implementation of the clinical marker tool was associated with a reduction in the number of cardiac arrests and improvement in hospital mortality for patients experiencing a medical emergency call. The timeframe of instability on the ward prior to the ICU admission may be used as a quality indicator to measure ICU Liaison Team performance. Further research is required to substantiate these findings.
本研究旨在评估在一所大学附属医院采用前后测试设计引入一种临床标志物工具的情况。该临床标志物工具旨在根据异常生命体征,协助在普通外科和内科病房环境中早期识别不稳定患者。
对临床标志物工具进行了为期3年的前后测试设计。纳入了2002年2月1日至2003年1月31日(实施前阶段)以及2003年2月1日至2005年1月31日(实施后阶段)期间从病房转入重症监护病房(ICU)的所有不稳定患者。对2002年1月1日至2004年12月31日期间每年拨打给复苏团队的医疗急救电话及此类事件导致的死亡率进行了二次分析。
在实施临床标志物工具之前,病房中有63例(41.2%)非计划转入ICU的患者存在临床标志物达6小时及以上。实施临床标志物工具后,有101例(24.5%)患者存在临床标志物达6小时及以上(p = 0.0002)。实施临床标志物工具后,非计划转入ICU患者的ICU住院时间、医院住院时间或医院死亡率并无差异。临床标志物工具实施后,复苏团队到达时仍有脉搏且有呼吸的患者数量从56例(47.9%)显著增加至181例(64.6%)(p = 0.0024)。此外,我们发现该组出院回家患者的生存率也相应提高,从33例(59%)增加至136例(75.1%)(p = 0.0003)。
ICU联络团队实施的临床标志物工具改善了病房环境中患者的管理,包括患者主动转入ICU。此外,临床标志物工具的实施与心脏骤停数量减少以及经历医疗急救呼叫患者的医院死亡率改善相关。ICU入院前在病房的不稳定时间可作为衡量ICU联络团队绩效的质量指标。需要进一步研究来证实这些发现。