Suppr超能文献

异常生命体征与美国住院退伍军人发生危急事件的风险增加有关。

Abnormal vital signs are associated with an increased risk for critical events in US veteran inpatients.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2009 Nov;80(11):1264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.08.012. Epub 2009 Sep 9.

Abstract

AIM

Establish the frequency of abnormal vital signs in medical and surgical ward patients; study their association with "critical events," which for the purposes of this study, were mortality, cardiac arrests and unplanned ICU transfers.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Four-month prospective, observational cohort study; University-affiliated US Veteran's hospital. Vital signs from all regular ward medical and surgical inpatients were recorded over the study period and compared with records of cardiac arrests, mortality and ICU admissions.

RESULTS

Using the Hospital's Medical Emergency Team criteria to define normal/abnormal thresholds for vital signs, abnormal vital signs (VS(MET)) were found in 16% of patients; of these; 35% experienced a critical event vs. 2.5% in the patients with normal vital signs (OR 21, 95% CI 12-35, p<0.001). The sensitivity of VS(MET) to predict a critical event was 0.72 and the positive predictive value was 0.35; sensitivity decreased to 0.28 and positive predictive value increased to 0.78 for patients that had two different VS(MET). Survival was significantly lower in both medical and surgical patients with VS(MET) at both 30 days and at 1 year following discharge (p<0.02). Both medical and surgical patients with VS(MET) had twice the length of stay of patients with normal vitals (3 vs. 7 days; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Even single recordings of VS(MET) signaled increased risk for critical events in hospital ward patients. Use of vital signs as criteria for additional patient assessment and possible ICU admission appears justified. Development of abnormal vitals during hospitalization may signify impaired physiologic reserve that places a patient at higher risk for mortality after discharge.

摘要

目的

确定内科和外科病房患者生命体征异常的频率;研究其与“危急事件”的关系,就本研究而言,“危急事件”是指死亡率、心脏骤停和非计划转入 ICU。

设计和方法

为期四个月的前瞻性、观察性队列研究;美国退伍军人事务部附属大学医院。研究期间记录了所有常规病房内科和外科住院患者的生命体征,并将其与心脏骤停、死亡率和 ICU 入院记录进行了比较。

结果

使用医院医疗应急小组标准来定义生命体征的正常/异常阈值,发现 16%的患者存在异常生命体征(VS(MET));其中,35%的患者发生了危急事件,而生命体征正常的患者中则有 2.5%发生了危急事件(OR 21,95%CI 12-35,p<0.001)。VS(MET)预测危急事件的灵敏度为 0.72,阳性预测值为 0.35;对于出现两种不同 VS(MET)的患者,灵敏度降至 0.28,阳性预测值升至 0.78。在 30 天和出院后 1 年,无论是内科还是外科患者,生命体征异常(VS(MET))的患者的生存率均显著降低(p<0.02)。生命体征异常(VS(MET))的内科和外科患者的住院时间均是生命体征正常患者的两倍(3 天与 7 天;p<0.001)。

结论

即使是单次记录的 VS(MET)也表明住院病房患者发生危急事件的风险增加。将生命体征用作额外患者评估和可能 ICU 入院的标准似乎是合理的。住院期间生命体征异常的发生可能表明生理储备受损,使患者出院后死亡的风险更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验