• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机模拟预测类病毒RNA二级结构的稳健性。II. 突变对之间的相互作用。

In silico predicted robustness of viroid RNA secondary structures. II. Interaction between mutation pairs.

作者信息

Sanjuán Rafael, Forment Javier, Elena Santiago F

机构信息

Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (CSIC-UPV), València, Spain.

出版信息

Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Nov;23(11):2123-30. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl083. Epub 2006 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1093/molbev/msl083
PMID:16901984
Abstract

Viroids are plant subviral pathogens whose genomes are constituted by a single-stranded and covalently closed small RNA molecule that does not encode for any protein. Most of the 29 described viroid species fold into a rodlike or quasi-rodlike structure, whereas a few of them fold as highly branched structures. In a previous study, we used RNA thermodynamic secondary structure prediction algorithms to compare the mutational robustness of all viroid species. Here we used the same approach to explore the sign and strength of epistasis among pairs of random mutations. We found that antagonistic interactions were more abundant than synergistic ones. However, despite their lower frequency, synergistic interactions tended to be more intense. Mutational robustness and the intensity of epistasis were correlated such that viroid species with large average mutational effects showed stronger antagonistic epistasis, whereas viroids with mild average mutational effects showed weaker antagonistic interactions. The strength of antagonistic epistasis decreased with genome complexity as a consequence of the gained robustness of duplicated genomes. In good agreement with our previous finding of an evolutionary trend toward increased robustness, we now found a trend toward reduced antagonistic epistasis.

摘要

类病毒是植物亚病毒病原体,其基因组由不编码任何蛋白质的单链且共价闭合的小RNA分子构成。已描述的29种类病毒物种中的大多数折叠成棒状或准棒状结构,而其中少数折叠成高度分支的结构。在先前的一项研究中,我们使用RNA热力学二级结构预测算法来比较所有类病毒物种的突变稳健性。在此,我们使用相同的方法来探究随机突变对之间上位性的符号和强度。我们发现拮抗相互作用比协同相互作用更为丰富。然而,尽管协同相互作用的频率较低,但它们往往更为强烈。突变稳健性与上位性强度相关,以至于平均突变效应大的类病毒物种表现出更强的拮抗上位性,而平均突变效应温和的类病毒表现出较弱的拮抗相互作用。由于重复基因组获得的稳健性,拮抗上位性的强度随着基因组复杂性的增加而降低。与我们先前发现的朝着增加稳健性的进化趋势高度一致,我们现在发现了朝着降低拮抗上位性的趋势。

相似文献

1
In silico predicted robustness of viroid RNA secondary structures. II. Interaction between mutation pairs.计算机模拟预测类病毒RNA二级结构的稳健性。II. 突变对之间的相互作用。
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Nov;23(11):2123-30. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl083. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
2
In silico predicted robustness of viroids RNA secondary structures. I. The effect of single mutations.计算机模拟预测类病毒RNA二级结构的稳定性。I. 单突变的影响。
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Jul;23(7):1427-36. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl005. Epub 2006 May 5.
3
Extremely high mutation rate of a hammerhead viroid.一种锤头状类病毒的极高突变率
Science. 2009 Mar 6;323(5919):1308. doi: 10.1126/science.1169202.
4
Simple genomes, complex interactions: epistasis in RNA virus.简单的基因组,复杂的相互作用:RNA 病毒中的上位性。
Chaos. 2010 Jun;20(2):026106. doi: 10.1063/1.3449300.
5
Viral RNA and evolved mutational robustness.病毒RNA与进化出的突变稳健性。
J Exp Zool. 1999 Aug 15;285(2):119-27.
6
Identification and characterization of a new coleviroid (CbVd-5).一种新型类病毒(CbVd-5)的鉴定与特性分析
Arch Virol. 2009;154(2):315-20. doi: 10.1007/s00705-008-0276-6. Epub 2008 Dec 27.
7
Phylogenetic analysis of viroid and viroid-like satellite RNAs from plants: a reassessment.植物类病毒和类病毒卫星RNA的系统发育分析:重新评估
J Mol Evol. 2001 Aug;53(2):155-9. doi: 10.1007/s002390010203.
8
Citrus viroid V: molecular characterization and synergistic interactions with other members of the genus Apscaviroid.柑橘类病毒V:分子特征及与苹果锈果类病毒属其他成员的协同相互作用
Virology. 2008 Jan 5;370(1):102-12. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.07.033. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
9
One-step site-directed mutagenesis of viroid dimeric cDNA.类病毒二聚体cDNA的一步定点诱变
J Virol Methods. 2007 Oct;145(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2007.05.027. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
10
A phylogenetic method for detecting positive epistasis in gene sequences and its application to RNA virus evolution.一种用于检测基因序列中正向上位性的系统发育方法及其在RNA病毒进化中的应用。
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Sep;23(9):1724-30. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl037. Epub 2006 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Parsimonious Scenario for the Emergence of Viroid-Like Replicons De Novo.简约情景下类病毒复制子的从头出现。
Viruses. 2019 May 9;11(5):425. doi: 10.3390/v11050425.
2
Attenuation of RNA viruses by redirecting their evolution in sequence space.通过在序列空间中引导 RNA 病毒的进化来衰减它们。
Nat Microbiol. 2017 Jun 5;2(8):17088. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.88.
3
Sampled ensemble neutrality as a feature to classify potential structured RNAs.将采样总体中性作为一种特征来对潜在的结构化RNA进行分类。
BMC Genomics. 2015 Feb 5;16(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12864-014-1203-8.
4
The role of mutational robustness in RNA virus evolution.突变稳定性在 RNA 病毒进化中的作用。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013 May;11(5):327-36. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3003. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
5
Describing the structural robustness landscape of bacterial small RNAs.描述细菌小 RNA 的结构鲁棒性全景。
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Apr 13;12:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-52.
6
Magnitude and sign epistasis among deleterious mutations in a positive-sense plant RNA virus.在正链植物 RNA 病毒的有害突变中,大小和符号上位性。
Heredity (Edinb). 2012 Aug;109(2):71-7. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2012.15. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
7
Evolutionary constraints to viroid evolution.类病毒进化的进化限制。
Viruses. 2009 Sep;1(2):241-54. doi: 10.3390/v1020241. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
8
Impact of epistasis and pleiotropy on evolutionary adaptation.上位性和多效性对进化适应的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jan 22;279(1727):247-56. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0870. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
9
EvoRSR: an integrated system for exploring evolution of RNA structural robustness.EvoRSR:一个用于探索RNA结构稳健性进化的集成系统。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 13;10:249. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-249.
10
Effects of recombination on complex regulatory circuits.重组对复杂调控回路的影响。
Genetics. 2009 Oct;183(2):673-84, 1SI-8SI. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.104174. Epub 2009 Aug 3.