• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于人类主体网络中着色问题的实验研究。

An experimental study of the coloring problem on human subject networks.

作者信息

Kearns Michael, Suri Siddharth, Montfort Nick

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Department of Computer and Information Science, 3330 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2006 Aug 11;313(5788):824-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1127207.

DOI:10.1126/science.1127207
PMID:16902134
Abstract

Theoretical work suggests that structural properties of naturally occurring networks are important in shaping behavior and dynamics. However, the relationships between structure and behavior are difficult to establish through empirical studies, because the networks in such studies are typically fixed. We studied networks of human subjects attempting to solve the graph or network coloring problem, which models settings in which it is desirable to distinguish one's behavior from that of one's network neighbors. Networks generated by preferential attachment made solving the coloring problem more difficult than did networks based on cyclical structures, and "small worlds" networks were easier still. We also showed that providing more information can have opposite effects on performance, depending on network structure.

摘要

理论研究表明,自然形成的网络的结构特性对于塑造行为和动态变化至关重要。然而,结构与行为之间的关系很难通过实证研究来确立,因为此类研究中的网络通常是固定不变的。我们研究了试图解决图或网络着色问题的人类受试者网络,该问题模拟了需要将自己的行为与网络邻居的行为区分开来的情境。通过优先连接生成的网络比基于循环结构的网络更难解决着色问题,而“小世界”网络则更容易解决。我们还表明,根据网络结构的不同,提供更多信息可能会对性能产生相反的影响。

相似文献

1
An experimental study of the coloring problem on human subject networks.关于人类主体网络中着色问题的实验研究。
Science. 2006 Aug 11;313(5788):824-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1127207.
2
[Model for search in social networks].[社交网络中的搜索模型]
Lakartidningen. 2002 Aug 29;99(35):3420.
3
Propagation of innovations in networked groups.网络群体中创新的传播。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Aug;137(3):422-33. doi: 10.1037/a0012798.
4
Social insect networks.社会性昆虫网络
Science. 2003 Sep 26;301(5641):1867-70. doi: 10.1126/science.1088945.
5
Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks.时变、多尺度和多重网络中的社区结构。
Science. 2010 May 14;328(5980):876-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1184819.
6
Graph-theoretical comparison reveals structural divergence of human protein interaction networks.图论比较揭示了人类蛋白质相互作用网络的结构差异。
Genome Inform. 2007;18:141-51.
7
Rules of social exchange: game theory, individual differences and psychopathology.社会交换规则:博弈论、个体差异与精神病理学
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 Mar;33(3):305-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Sep 27.
8
Spread of two linked social norms on complex interaction networks.两种相互关联的社会规范在复杂交互网络中的传播。
J Theor Biol. 2004 Sep 7;230(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.04.028.
9
The influence of social structure on the propagation of social information in artificial primate groups: a graph-based simulation approach.社会结构对人工灵长类群体中社会信息传播的影响:一种基于图的模拟方法。
J Theor Biol. 2008 May 7;252(1):77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Feb 9.
10
Identity and search in social networks.社交网络中的身份与搜索。
Science. 2002 May 17;296(5571):1302-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1070120.

引用本文的文献

1
Escape from fraught states in a coordination game.在协调博弈中摆脱紧张状态。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Feb 21;11(2):231314. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231314. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Adversarial Dynamics in Centralized Versus Decentralized Intelligent Systems.集中式与分布式智能系统中的对抗动力学
Top Cogn Sci. 2025 Apr;17(2):374-391. doi: 10.1111/tops.12705. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
Humans strategically avoid connecting to others who agree and avert the emergence of network polarization in a coordination task.人类在协调任务中会有意避免与意见一致的人进行交流,从而避免网络极化的出现。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 12;13(1):11299. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38353-w.
4
Link updating strategies influence consensus decisions as a function of the direction of communication.链接更新策略作为沟通方向的函数会影响共识决策。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jun 7;10(6):230215. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230215. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
The role of position in consensus dynamics of polarizable networks.位置在极化网络共识动态中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 9;13(1):3972. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30613-z.
6
The dual problems of coordination and anti-coordination on random bipartite graphs.随机二分图上的协调与反协调双重问题。
New J Phys. 2021 Nov;23(11). doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac3319. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
7
Collective patterns and stable misunderstandings in networks striving for consensus without a common value system.在没有共同价值体系的情况下,网络为达成共识而努力时出现的集体模式和稳定误解。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 22;12(1):3028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06880-7.
8
Self-organized division of cognitive labor.自组织的认知分工。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 19;16(7):e0254532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254532. eCollection 2021.
9
Human-agent coordination in a group formation game.群体形成游戏中的人机协调。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 24;11(1):10744. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90123-8.
10
Random choices facilitate solutions to collective network coloring problems by artificial agents.随机选择有助于人工智能体解决集体网络着色问题。
iScience. 2021 Mar 24;24(4):102340. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102340. eCollection 2021 Apr 23.