Suppr超能文献

延迟进食的局部影响。

Local effects of delayed food.

作者信息

Davison Michael, Baum William M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Auckland City Campus, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Mar;87(2):241-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.13-06.

Abstract

Five pigeons were trained on a procedure in which seven concurrent variable-interval schedules arranged seven different food-rate ratios in random sequence in each session. Each of these components lasted for 10 response-produced food deliveries, and components were separated by 10-s blackouts. We varied delays to food (signaled by blackout) between the two response alternatives in an experiment with three phases: In Phase 1, the delay on one alternative was 0 s, and the other was varied between 0 and 8 s; in Phase 2, both delays were equal and were varied from 0 to 4 s; in Phase 3, the two delays summed to 8 s, and each was varied from 1 to 7 s. The results showed that increasing delay affected local choice, measured by a pulse in preference, in the same way as decreasing magnitude, but we found also that increasing the delay at the other alternative increased local preference. This result casts doubt on the traditional view that a reinforcer strengthens a response depending only on the reinforcer's value discounted by any response-reinforcer delay. The results suggest that food guides, rather than strengthens, behavior.

摘要

五只鸽子接受了一项训练程序,在该程序中,七个并发的可变间隔时间表在每个实验环节中以随机顺序安排了七种不同的食物速率比。这些成分中的每一个持续到10次由反应产生的食物投递,并且成分之间由10秒的黑屏间隔开。在一个分为三个阶段的实验中,我们改变了两个反应选项之间到食物的延迟(由黑屏信号表示):在第一阶段,一个选项的延迟为0秒,另一个在0到8秒之间变化;在第二阶段,两个延迟相等,并在0到4秒之间变化;在第三阶段,两个延迟总和为8秒,并且每个延迟在1到7秒之间变化。结果表明,增加延迟对以偏好脉冲衡量的局部选择的影响与减小量值的影响相同,但我们还发现,增加另一个选项的延迟会增加局部偏好。这一结果对传统观点提出了质疑,即强化物仅根据任何反应-强化物延迟所折扣的强化物价值来加强反应。结果表明,食物引导而非强化行为。

相似文献

1
Local effects of delayed food.延迟进食的局部影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Mar;87(2):241-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.13-06.
3
Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.冲动与自控选择之间的偏好逆转。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 May;99(3):260-76. doi: 10.1002/jeab.23. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
8
Do conditional reinforcers count?条件强化物算数吗?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Nov;86(3):269-83. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.56-05.

引用本文的文献

3
4
Development and maintenance of choice in a dynamic environment.在动态环境中发展和维护选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Sep;94(2):175-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-175.
5
Dynamics of choice: a tutorial.选择的动态:教程。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Sep;94(2):161-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-161.

本文引用的文献

1
Do conditional reinforcers count?条件强化物算数吗?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Nov;86(3):269-83. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.56-05.
3
Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.刺激、强化物与行为:一种整合
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 May;71(3):439-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-439.
5
A contextual model of concurrent-chains choice.一种并发链选择的上下文模型。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):113-29. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-113.
10
The matching law.匹配律。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):489-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-489.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验