Suppr超能文献

延迟进食的局部影响。

Local effects of delayed food.

作者信息

Davison Michael, Baum William M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Auckland City Campus, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Mar;87(2):241-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.13-06.

Abstract

Five pigeons were trained on a procedure in which seven concurrent variable-interval schedules arranged seven different food-rate ratios in random sequence in each session. Each of these components lasted for 10 response-produced food deliveries, and components were separated by 10-s blackouts. We varied delays to food (signaled by blackout) between the two response alternatives in an experiment with three phases: In Phase 1, the delay on one alternative was 0 s, and the other was varied between 0 and 8 s; in Phase 2, both delays were equal and were varied from 0 to 4 s; in Phase 3, the two delays summed to 8 s, and each was varied from 1 to 7 s. The results showed that increasing delay affected local choice, measured by a pulse in preference, in the same way as decreasing magnitude, but we found also that increasing the delay at the other alternative increased local preference. This result casts doubt on the traditional view that a reinforcer strengthens a response depending only on the reinforcer's value discounted by any response-reinforcer delay. The results suggest that food guides, rather than strengthens, behavior.

摘要

五只鸽子接受了一项训练程序,在该程序中,七个并发的可变间隔时间表在每个实验环节中以随机顺序安排了七种不同的食物速率比。这些成分中的每一个持续到10次由反应产生的食物投递,并且成分之间由10秒的黑屏间隔开。在一个分为三个阶段的实验中,我们改变了两个反应选项之间到食物的延迟(由黑屏信号表示):在第一阶段,一个选项的延迟为0秒,另一个在0到8秒之间变化;在第二阶段,两个延迟相等,并在0到4秒之间变化;在第三阶段,两个延迟总和为8秒,并且每个延迟在1到7秒之间变化。结果表明,增加延迟对以偏好脉冲衡量的局部选择的影响与减小量值的影响相同,但我们还发现,增加另一个选项的延迟会增加局部偏好。这一结果对传统观点提出了质疑,即强化物仅根据任何反应-强化物延迟所折扣的强化物价值来加强反应。结果表明,食物引导而非强化行为。

相似文献

1
Local effects of delayed food.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Mar;87(2):241-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.13-06.
2
Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Jan;79(1):87-109. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-87.
3
Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 May;99(3):260-76. doi: 10.1002/jeab.23. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
4
Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Jan;77(1):65-89. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-65.
5
Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):67-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67.
6
Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Jul;80(1):95-129. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-95.
7
Concurrent schedules: discriminating reinforcer-ratio reversals at a fixed time after the previous reinforcer.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Sep;100(2):117-34. doi: 10.1002/jeab.43. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
8
Do conditional reinforcers count?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Nov;86(3):269-83. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.56-05.
9
Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Sep;108(2):204-222. doi: 10.1002/jeab.269. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
10
Procrastination by pigeons with fixed-interval response requirements.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Mar;69(2):185-97. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-185.

引用本文的文献

1
Reinforcement: food signals the time and location of future food.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Jul;96(1):63-86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-63.
2
Emergent stimulus relations depend on stimulus correlation and not on reinforcement contingencies.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 May;95(3):327-42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-327.
3
Choice in quail neonates: the origins of generalized matching.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):315-26. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-315.
4
Development and maintenance of choice in a dynamic environment.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Sep;94(2):175-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-175.
5
Dynamics of choice: a tutorial.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Sep;94(2):161-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-161.
6
Dynamics of choice: relative rate and amount affect local preference at three different time scales.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 May;91(3):293-317. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-293.
7
Sensitivity of conditional-discrimination performance to within-session variation of reinforcer frequency.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):301-11. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-301.
8
The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior at zero, fifty, and one hundred.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Jan;89(1):111-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.89-111.

本文引用的文献

1
Do conditional reinforcers count?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Nov;86(3):269-83. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.56-05.
2
Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jul;86(1):43-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.57-05.
3
Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 May;71(3):439-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-439.
4
Concurrent choice: Effects of overall reinforcer rate and the temporal distribution of reinforcers.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Mar;65(2):445-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-445.
5
A contextual model of concurrent-chains choice.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):113-29. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-113.
6
Choice and delay of reinforcement: Effects of terminal-link stimulus and response conditions.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Mar;59(2):361-71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-361.
7
Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jan;49(1):21-36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-21.
8
Bias and sensitivity to reinforcement in a concurrent-chain schedule.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jul;40(1):15-34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-15.
9
On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231-42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231.
10
The matching law.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):489-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-489.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验